> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 13. august 2004 21:02
> To: Thomas Madsen
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] TOAST tables keeps growing!
>
>
> "Thomas Madsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephan Szabo
> Sent: 13. august 2004 19:36
> To: Thomas Madsen
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] TOAST tables keeps growing!
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Thomas Madsen wrote:
>
> > I'm runn
Title: RE: [ADMIN] Pseudo-Off-topic-survey: Opinions about future of Postgresql(MySQL)?
Informix was bought by IBM a few years ago so one has to wonder how long before it gets rolled into DB2.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Browne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Gregory S. Williamson") writes:
> b) Informix is now part of IBM and is likely to be replaced by DB2
> over the next few years ... any bets on whether parts of Informix /
> Illustra / etc. migrate into some variant of open source ?
It's pretty clear that IBM bought out Informix
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Enrique Arizn) writes:
>> But in the last ten years, I have never once heard mention of
>> Ingres in a commercial context. I was aware of it via "University
>> Ingres" and because of knowing a little history, both of which came
>> from academia, not from the comme
Joe Conway wrote:
Steve Bergman wrote:
Anyone have an SRPM of spec file for the beta?
I just created and posted a source RPM for 8.0.0beta1. As I'm not the
usual packager, and a pure hack when it comes to building my own RPMs,
it would be a Good Thing(tm) if someone else could vet this package;
Folks,
I apologise if this is the wrong list for my query. I've looked
through the FAQ, list archives, and Google for an answer, with no
solution listed, although the same question has been asked many times
before.
I think I know why pam authentication fails with the pam_unix*
modules, but wou
Dallas N Antley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think I know why pam authentication fails with the pam_unix*
> modules, but would appreciate your opinion.
I think you've proven that the particular PAM modules you are testing
with are useless for programs executing as non-root, but that doesn't
mea
/- On Monday (8/16/2004 19:35) Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dallas N Antley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think I know why pam authentication fails with the pam_unix*
> > modules, but would appreciate your opinion.
>
> I think you've proven that the particular PAM modules you are test
