Hi.
Really sorry, previous post was completely inconsistent. Actually, in addition, RULES
exists. I use postgresql-7.3.5. Here the dump
-
CREATE TABLE t_test (
id integer,
message text
);
CREATE VIEW vw_test AS
SEL
Hi list
This is my first post here, and I've searched google but couldn't find the
solution.
I'm trying to run pg_autovacuum on all my databases. All my Debian sarge
machines use version 7.4.5-3
postgresql install
postgresql-client
Hallo
I try to restore a large DB with BLOBS. I created the dump file with:
pg_dump -Fc -b > dump.file
During the restore process startet with the following command:
pg_restore -d dump.file
the process breakes with the error message that a table couldn't be found.
So I started the pg_restore
Hi
> I thought, that pg_restore will organize the restore-prozess in an optimal
> order. This seems not work correct!!?? I would be grateful to hear any
> hints.
pg_restore does not priortize till now idealy it must be like
restoring the functions >> tables >> views >> seqences so on...
This
Vishal
Thank you for your answer. My problem is, I have to restore BLOBS. The
documentation says, it's only possible to restore blobs with pg_restore in
one part. The way you suppose does not work with BLOBS because the
restauration of single objects will not restore BOLBS.
Horst Düster
-Urs
Hi,
Try "pg_restore -l" to generate a TOC.
You may rearrange the TOC file.
Then use "pg_restore -L".
Hope it helps,
Janko Richter
Düster Horst wrote:
Vishal
Thank you for your answer. My problem is, I have to restore BLOBS. The
documentation says, it's only possible to restore blobs with pg_restore
OK, the manual talk about this solution, but I do have more than 2000
objects in my DB. What is the reason that pg_dump/pg_restore are not able to
create an correct order ob DB objects with respect to their constraints. All
tables must be created before the views are created and so on?
Horst
---
Hello,
maybe some known issues regarding subj. in version 7.4.5? I have a web
application which is gathering date from postgre DB. And with a bach of
row the problem starts appearing. Everything's ok in v7.4.2. My DB is
indexed.
Thanks!
Edgars
---(end of broadcast)--
Hi Ivan,
I had the same experience as you. I swear I did all the things required.
Eventually it started working with enough postmaster restarts and fiddling
with the files. I'm sorry I can't be more helpful, cause I was never quite
sure why it finally decided to start working...
Keep fiddling a
Hi ,
I need to implement the following the replication scenario in
postgres database. Here are the details of what we are looking to
implement.
Lets say I have 2 nodes Node1(US) and Node2(Canada),
Node1: tableA , tableB
Node2: tableB , tableA
tableA in Node1 is the master and it should replic
The problem was in my resolve.conf, the nameserver I've set is my datacenter
provider who have localhost.provider.net point to 127.0.0.1 and postmaster
couldn't bind to that host. For whatever reason. It does not check /etc/hosts
too so I'll play with it on Mondey.
На 29.10.2004 18:20 вие напис
Thanks Tom.
May I ask in which version this bug is fixed?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 11:10 AM
To: Lee Wu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_ctl stop -m fast
"Lee Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They claim on
Hi all,
I've encounter a couple of bugaboos recently in a production database I
run (7.3.4 on Solaris 8). One is that killing a query from a client
tool such as dbVisualizer can cause the process on the server to become
a runaway, consuming CPU and causing other processes to go into a
TIME_WAIT
This is kinda weird. I'm using the pg8 beta4. When I install on Win
2k3 server, it lets me do everything I want to do through pgAdmin,
however I prefer the console based psql. Problem is, when I connect
to template1 (or anything else) I'm unable to "createdb". This
happens when I attempt it w/o
I have a database that's about 18GBs.
[base]# du -hs 17165
18G 17165
Occasionally someone runs a query and they get
"could not write block 460593 of temporary file: No space left on device"
At present the filesystem for the database has about 3GB free.
I'd like to give the temporary files a f
Hi,
One of our customers complains about
pg_ctl stop -m fast
could not shutdown PG server though we cannot
reproduce the same problem here.
They claim only "-m immediate" can take PG down
after issuing "-m fast".
The PG version is 7.3.2.
What might prevent "-m fast" to shutdown PG (long
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'd like to give the temporary files a filesystem of their own.
> What would be the preferred method?
Change the subdirectory $PGDATA/base//pgsql_tmp/ into a symlink
to someplace on another filesystem.
regards, tom lane
Do you have sufficient space and is your file system NTFS
--
With Best Regards,
Vishal Kashyap.
Did you know SaiPACS is one and only PACS
Management tool.
http://saihertz.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pallav Kalva) writes:
> I need to implement the following the replication scenario in
> postgres database. Here are the details of what we are looking to
> implement.
>
> Lets say I have 2 nodes Node1(US) and Node2(Canada),
>
> Node1: tableA , tableB
> Node2: tableB , tableA
I had the problem in 7.3.2. Postgres pg_restore reied to restore views before tables.
I had to use -l to generate a dump list and
change the order of restore manually and restore with -L
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Düster Horst
Sent:
21 matches
Mail list logo