Dear group,
I have two databases in my system.
In firstdb i am having the following problem:
firstdb=# \d targets
ERROR: could not access status of transaction 362
DETAIL: could not open file
"/var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_clog/": No such file or
directory
when I vacuumed it:
$ vacuu
On 8/5/06, jesus martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i want to distribute a copy of PostGres to my clients.they really dont know anything about installingprograms orconfigurating remote RDBMS sql-servers,so i dont want to give them the"official-PostGres-installer.exe
"but my own installer.exe (win3
> For years I have struggled with desktop applications and data
> access/storage. Databases are very powerful tools but, other than MS
> Access, I have not seen any that are easily distributable bundled with
> a desktop application. Not having a personal database to bundle with
> my applications
>
> For years I have struggled with desktop applications and data
> access/storage. Databases are very powerful tools but, other than MS
> Access, I have not seen any that are easily distributable bundled with
> a desktop application. Not having a personal database to bundle with
> my applicati
On 8/6/06, Amadeus Zilfinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For years I have struggled with desktop applications and data> access/storage. Databases are very powerful tools but, other than MS> Access, I have not seen any that are easily distributable bundled with
> a desktop application. Not havin
Hi,
I've got a database with about 155GB of binary data, however when I run
the unix utility df, it reports only 60GB of disk space is being
used. I've extracted random samples of data from the
database, and it all appears correct, so I presume it's not
corrupt. Can anyone tell me whether there
>
>
> Would something like SQLite support the full functionality that we get
> from PostgreSQL: subqueries, transactions, views, triggers and stored
> procedures? MySQL does not (yes I know they are adding some or all of
> this but it isn't all there or proven to be reliable yet).
>
> I will
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 04:42:47PM -0700, Geoff Parker wrote:
> I've got a database with about 155GB of binary data, however
> when I run the unix utility df, it reports only 60GB of disk space
> is being used. I've extracted random samples of data from the
> database, and it all appears correct
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Amadeus Zilfinski) wrote:
> My only real issue with PostgresQL is that it is a client/server
> database, that is not embeddable. If it was embeddable then I could
> use it with no issue, and would in fact rather use it. I recall some
> people are working on that, but don't have a
unsubsribe me.
--
Yoon Lee
Software Developer
W:604 451 4514
C:604 512 4460
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
messag
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
nhan
Do you Yahoo!?
Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
I have a minor problem with autovacuum.
Below are the logs:
2006-08-06 15:37:08 MDTLOG: autovacuum: processing database "postgres"
2006-08-06 15:37:22 MDTFATAL: database "psotgres" does not exist
2006-08-06 15:37:52 MDTFATAL: database "psotgres" does not exist
2006-08-06 15:38:22 MDTFATAL: dat
Ignore question.
I found the problem. When I launched pgagent, I had a transposition of
the database name.
After I identified thi and restarted pgagent everything looks ok.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Benjamin Krajmalnik
14 matches
Mail list logo
