2006. November 16. 08.05 dátummal Kis János Tamás ezt írta:
> 2006. November 8. 02.34 dátummal Michael McCloskey ezt írta:
> > see postmaster.exe and 4 postgres processes.
Ooops!
I don't see the ".exe"...
I'm sorry!
bye,
kjt
McAfee SCM 4.1 által ellenőrizve!
---(end of
Dear list members,
I see a strange behaviour using root.crt. PostgreSQL always waits a
client certificate to check agains root.crt. But I set up a
'hostnossl' auth line un pg_hba.conf, PostgreSQL still wants a client
certificate. Also fails if line is a 'host'.
Better with an example:
---pg_hba.
"[EMAIL PROTECTED] (IMAP)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see a strange behaviour using root.crt. PostgreSQL always waits a
> client certificate to check agains root.crt. But I set up a
> 'hostnossl' auth line un pg_hba.conf, PostgreSQL still wants a client
> certificate.
If your client first tri
I am running the pre-built Windows version of postgresql 8.1. I have
a local LAN with a 10.6/16 network. Apparently there's something more
than what's in the FAQ or my interpretation of the manual to get
remote connections working.
pg_hba.conf:
host all all 10.6/16 md5
host all all 127.0.0
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Paul Forgey wrote:
I am running the pre-built Windows version of postgresql 8.1. I have a local
LAN with a 10.6/16 network. Apparently there's something more than what's in
the FAQ or my interpretation of the manual to get remote connections working.
pg_hba.conf:
host al
Paul Forgey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am running the pre-built Windows version of postgresql 8.1. I have
> a local LAN with a 10.6/16 network. Apparently there's something more
> than what's in the FAQ or my interpretation of the manual to get
> remote connections working.
> pg_hba.co
Jeff Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe you must list all 4 octets of the subnet.
Oh, duh. The comments in inet_aton() show that it is interpreting
"10.6" in what most people nowadays would find a surprising way:
case 1: /* a -- 32 bits */
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeff Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I believe you must list all 4 octets of the subnet.
Oh, duh. The comments in inet_aton() show that it is interpreting
"10.6" in what most people nowadays would find a surprising way:
case 1:
Jeff Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul, just add the 0s and you'll be golden.
I've tweaked the SGML docs to make it clearer that omitting trailing
zeroes here isn't a good idea.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)
On Nov 17, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Jeff Frost wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Paul Forgey wrote:
I am running the pre-built Windows version of postgresql 8.1. I
have a local LAN with a 10.6/16 network. Apparently there's
something more than what's in the FAQ or my interpretation of the
manual to g
Brad Nicholson wrote:
> Excellent addition. I suggest in 24.1 - Shared Disk Failover something
> about the risk of having two postmasters come up on the same data
> directory, which is entirely possible if the old master doesn't release
> the disk in time.
I have added a mention of this.
---
11 matches
Mail list logo
