On 15.08.2007 21:30, Medi Montaseri wrote:
I am looking for some suggestions to optimize the following
problem/solution.
Given two nodes A and B (two computers) in a active-passive mode where A is
running PG engine, and B is simply standing by, and a common storage
(twin tailed) ( or from pg_
Hannes Dorbath wrote:
On 15.08.2007 21:30, Medi Montaseri wrote:
I am looking for some suggestions to optimize the following
problem/solution.
Given two nodes A and B (two computers) in a active-passive mode
where A is
running PG engine, and B is simply standing by, and a common storage
(t
Thank you both for your input...this is indeed the type of analysis I was
looking for. Now I have to read and understand them more carefully. At this
point I wanted to thank you both and hopefully I can trouble you both with
some follow ups in the future.
Cheers
Medi
On 8/16/07, Chander Ganesan <
Tom, really... the socket lies in /tmp/. The socket file has 0777
postgres:postgres. /tmp/ has 0777 root:root.
The socket file is removed when I stop the database.
On 8/15/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Hilton Perantunes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > When I stop the database,
Hilton Perantunes escribió:
> Tom, really... the socket lies in /tmp/. The socket file has 0777
> postgres:postgres. /tmp/ has 0777 root:root.
psql is complaining about /var/run/postgresql (the Debian packaging of
libpq does that). Try setting PGHOST to /tmp, like in
PGHOST=/tmp psql
--
Alvar
Alvaro, it works like a charm =). Thank you all.
Bad, bad Debian.. no cookies for you (and I'll read the error messages more
carefully next time)!
Abraços..
Hilton Perantunes
On 8/16/07, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hilton Perantunes escribió:
> > Tom, really... the socket li
