Hi,
Need immediate attention to my concern.
While starting the postgreSQL service, i get the error message as
Could not open process token "error code-5"
Appreciate if any one can help me out on this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Sima
Sima asked:
<...>
>
> While starting the postgreSQL service, i get the error message as
>
> Could not open process token "error code-5"
>
> Appreciate if any one can help me out on this issue.
>
Without more information its hard to say -- you might provide some information
about what operati
Bebarta, Simanchala wrote:
Need immediate attention to my concern.
OK.
While starting the postgreSQL service, i get the error message as
Could not open process token "error code-5"
What version of PostgreSQL?
What operating-system?
Have you had any problems before this point?
--
Richard
Hi,
My postgreSQL 8.2.4 is installed on Windows server 2003 Enterprise
Edition.
Windows Server configuration:
RAM 4GB
HDD 50 GB
Processor: Pentium 4 CPU 3.20 GHz
When the shared_buffers = 2048 MB is set in the Postgresql.conf file,
while starting the service, I got the error
Could not
Don't forget to cc: the list, other people will probably know more than me.
Bebarta, Simanchala wrote:
Hi,
My postgreSQL 8.2.4 is installed on Windows server 2003 Enterprise
Edition.
OK. Thanks.
8.2.5 has been released, and you should consider upgrading soon. The
Windows-related changes se
Yes, when I set the value to 1300 MB, everything goes fine. Any value
higher than this value does not allow me to start the service.
sima
-Original Message-
From: Richard Huxton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 3:40 PM
To: Bebarta, Simanchala
Cc: PG-General Maili
Bebarta, Simanchala wrote:
>>
>> Does the problem go away when you put shared_buffers back to a lower
>> number?
>>
Yes, when I set the value to 1300 MB, everything goes fine. Any value
higher than this value does not allow me to start the service.
It's quite possible that you can't go any high
On Nov 19, 2007 4:15 AM, Bebarta, Simanchala
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, when I set the value to 1300 MB, everything goes fine. Any value
> higher than this value does not allow me to start the service.
Please don't top post.
Anyway, are you sure that increasing shared_buffers that high is
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 10:33 +, Richard Huxton wrote:
> Bebarta, Simanchala wrote:
> >>
> >> Does the problem go away when you put shared_buffers back to a lower
> >> number?
> >>
> > Yes, when I set the value to 1300 MB, everything goes fine. Any value
> > higher than this value does not a
Hi List;
I'm working with a client with several highly active 8.1.4 servers. I want to
run a weekly cron that will vacuum ALL db tables except those with entries in
pg_autovacuum (where we've setup manual/cron vacuums) in order to eliminate
transaction ID wraparound failure warnings (which come
Kevin Kempter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm working with a client with several highly active 8.1.4 servers. I want to
> run a weekly cron that will vacuum ALL db tables except those with entries in
> pg_autovacuum (where we've setup manual/cron vacuums) in order to eliminate
> transaction ID
Sorry, I meant to send this to the list:
We have a handful of tables that are quite large and take several hours to
vacuum. We're managing these large tables by using cron via a schedule that
accounts for system load. I want to pull the list of all tables and exclude
these large tables from th
This usually does it for me:-
select *
from
-- information_schema.tables
pg_catalog.pg_tables
--WHERE
-- table_schema = 'public'
--ORDER BY
-- table_name
On 11/20/07, Kevin Kempter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I meant to send this to the list:
>
>
> We have a handful of tables
Kevin Kempter wrote:
Sorry, I meant to send this to the list:
We have a handful of tables that are quite large and take several hours to
vacuum. We're managing these large tables by using cron via a schedule that
accounts for system load. I want to pull the list of all tables and exclude
the
14 matches
Mail list logo
