Looks interesting, how well does MICRO-OLAP support
the full range of PostgreSQL's types? Things like
"cidr" for instance.
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 15:06 -0400, Anibal David Acosta wrote:
> MICRO-OLAP Database designer for postgres is a great tool.
>
>
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL
Hi,
We just upgraded Best Practical's RT from 3.6 to 3.81 and gave the
database completely own machine. And the users still complain that it is
dog slow. :-( I installed pg_top and it seems that at the beginning of
the ticket display RT-issues a query that eats everything the database
has. Query i
Thanks for the information so far
My Application runs on FreeBSd box and main technological component are Apache
and mod Perl, database is postgres. I have already scanned pg_stat_activity and
pg_listener table but could get any clue. Pg_stat_activity shows list of all
idle processes but command
"pgBee is a set of Java classes I wrote for automating bulk updates of
Postgresql databases on Linux servers. It requires Java (doh!) and Ant (as a
build/execute front-end), it is cronnable and performs very well, especially
in multi-threaded mode, which takes full advantage of multi-core CPUs in
m
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Vivek_Sharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the information so far
> My Application runs on FreeBSd box and main technological component are
> Apache and mod Perl, database is postgres. I have already scanned
> pg_stat_activity and pg_listener table but c
Hi All;
Is there an easy way to determine the actual OS disk cache size or at
least a set of guidelines based on the OS and disk subsystem type ?
Thanks in advance...
/Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Mauri Sahlberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We just upgraded Best Practical's RT from 3.6 to 3.81 and gave the
> database completely own machine. And the users still complain that it is
> dog slow.
Moved up from below:
> Version : 8.1.11
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Guido Barosio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Vivek_Sharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for the information so far
OK, I'm not BSD expert (Tom Lane might help out here) but I'm guessing
that what we see in the following lines o
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM, kevin kempter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All;
>
> Is there an easy way to determine the actual OS disk cache size or at least
> a set of guidelines based on the OS and disk subsystem type ?
On a DB only machine, you can expect the OS to use most of the spare
m
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:10:01AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Mauri Sahlberg
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We just upgraded Best Practical's RT from 3.6 to 3.81 and gave the
> > database completely own machine. And the users still complain that it
Hi All
I recently made a change to my Postgres Server and upped the max_fsm_page
size to 6
Since then, Postgres has been using about 30-80MB of swap space.
This box has 4GB of RAM. All up Postgres has not been allocated no more
than 3G
Is this swapping something to be worried about?
Chee
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:30 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All
>
>
> I recently made a change to my Postgres Server and upped the max_fsm_page
> size to 6
> Since then, Postgres has been using about 30-80MB of swap space.
>
> This box has 4GB of RAM. All up Postgres has not been allocat
12 matches
Mail list logo
