On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 22:12 -0500, Brian Weaver wrote:
> So when did the installation of PL/PgSQL into all databases become standard
> operating procedure? It wasn't standard (or at least it didn't choke) on
> the installation of versions 8.3 and 8.4 that I have used on CentOS 5.
>
> Seems like a
Guillaume,
Thanks for the pointer. Is it just me that finds it the behavior of pg_restore
odd? If the default installation since 9.0 has PL/PgSQL installed then why does
pg_restore still emit statements to create the language? As a developer by
trade it smells like a bug.
-- Brian
Sent from
On Feb 25, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Brian Weaver wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer. Is it just me that finds it the behavior of
> pg_restore odd? If the default installation since 9.0 has PL/PgSQL installed
> then why does pg_restore still emit statements to create the language? As a
> developer by trad
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 09:23 -0700, Scott Ribe wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Brian Weaver wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the pointer. Is it just me that finds it the behavior of
> > pg_restore odd? If the default installation since 9.0 has PL/PgSQL
> > installed then why does pg_restore still em
Thank you all for the explanation. I'll work around the issue. It's nice to
understand the thought process even though I might disagree with it.
-- Brian
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 25, 2012, at 13:10, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 09:23 -0700, Scott Ribe wrote:
>> On Feb 2
