Hello.
Sorry if this is redundant, but I can't find any 'cookbook' for getting
this setup.
The best I've found is here:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/images/5/58/06.5_-_Devrim_Gunduz_-_PostgreSQLClusteringWithRedHatClusterSuite--LT.pdf
but, it doesn't go into setup details.
I have a few
Hi,
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 15:26 -0400, Gary Webster wrote:
The best I've found is here:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/images/5/58/06.5_-_Devrim_Gunduz_-_PostgreSQLClusteringWithRedHatClusterSuite--LT.pdf
but, it doesn't go into setup details.
http://www.gunduz.org/download.php?dlid=190
has a
Hi there,
I wonder why are you considering this solution, as if something wrong
comes within the data (logical corruption, user error) it will be spread
on both locations, Would not be better a delayed standby database.
I am curious because I am setting this up right now and do not get all
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:33 -0700, amador alvarez wrote:
I wonder why are you considering this solution
* Automatic failover detection
* No replication overhead, in case you don't need it.
RHCS+PostgreSQL can also be used when you shard your data to multiple
databases, and use each server as
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:33 PM, amador alvarez aalva...@d2.com wrote:
I wonder why are you considering this solution, as if something wrong comes
within the data (logical corruption, user error) it will be spread on both
locations, Would not be better a delayed standby database.
That's a
Hi. I'm confused about how to restrict databases from roles. When I create
a new database, I thought I would have to grant connect to a role in order
for that role to connect to it and see its objects.
But...
[admin@toolbox:acct] 14:50:23 create database foo owner postgres;
CREATE DATABASE
Gordon
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Gordon Shannon gordo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. I'm confused about how to restrict databases from roles. When I
create
a new database, I thought I would have to grant connect to a role in order
for that role to connect to it and see its objects.
Hi!
My comerade has to decide for his so to say generic and a bit
unpredicted PostgreSQL needs for web applications between Intel and AMD
based server. For now it has been coming down to these processor choices
1. Dell PowerEdge R810 which has 2 x Intel® Xeon® E7-4830 2.13GHz, 24M
cache
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Imre Oolberg i...@auul.pri.ee wrote:
Hi!
My comerade has to decide for his so to say generic and a bit unpredicted
PostgreSQL needs for web applications between Intel and AMD based server.
For now it has been coming down to these processor choices
1. Dell
As a followup to my previous post, if you get a solid white box, you
could build a machine for $17k that will beat the two previously
listed machines pretty badly, and in a small form factor as well.
Take one of these:
http://www.aberdeeninc.com/abcatg/mb1661.htm
and throw 4 16C AMDs and 128G
10 matches
Mail list logo