CS DBA wrote:
> I've fired up 2 CentOS 6.2 VM's via vmware fusion 5 (on a mac).
> psql -h 192.168.91.145
> psql: could not connect to server: No route to host
That problem has nothing to do with PostgreSQL; you might have
better luck on a list related to the other technologies.
FWIW, on Li
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Kevin Grittner
wrote:
> CS DBA wrote:
>
>> I've fired up 2 CentOS 6.2 VM's via vmware fusion 5 (on a mac).
>
>> psql -h 192.168.91.145
>> psql: could not connect to server: No route to host
>
> That problem has nothing to do with PostgreSQL; you might have
> bette
"Kevin Grittner" writes:
> CS DBA wrote:
>> psql: could not connect to server: No route to host
> That problem has nothing to do with PostgreSQL; you might have
> better luck on a list related to the other technologies.
> FWIW, on Linux I would start with `netstat -plnt` to see if the
> proce
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:35:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "No route to host" doesn't have anything to do with whether there's
> anything listening on the target port ... what's more likely is that the
> OP mistyped the IP address, or else there's something wrong with his
> network layout, interface ne
