Re: [ADMIN] postgresql patching

2013-09-10 Thread Lou Picciano
Generally: Because the PostgreSQL coders/fixers/packagers are damn good about 
integrating needed fixes quickly, to obviate the need for spurious 'field 
patching'

As an example: 
http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/search-results?query=postgresqlsearch_type=allcves=on
 

Note that the first handful of CVEs listed there are labeled 'pre-' 9.2.4, or 
9.1.9. IE, these are remediated in most recent minor revisions of PostgreSQL 
code.

If you're seeking to make other, 'off-trunk' mods to the code, experts here 
will chime in...

Lou Picciano
 
- Original Message -
From: rajkphb 
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Sent: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 03:17:04 - (UTC)
Subject: [ADMIN] postgresql patching

Hi,


 I am relatively new to postgresql. I did not find any detailed documentation 
on patching .
Please provide me some links where i can get some note on postgresql patching.

Why does postgres documentation does not have patching topic?

Thanks 
Suhas






View this message in context: postgresql patching

Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



[ADMIN] postgresql patching

2013-09-10 Thread rajkphb
Hi, I am relatively new to postgresql. I did not find any detailed
documentation on patching .Please provide me some links where i can get some
note on postgresql patching.Why does postgres documentation does not have
patching topic?Thanks Suhas



--
View this message in context: 
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/postgresql-patching-tp5770236.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [ADMIN] postgresql patching

2013-09-10 Thread Amador Alvarez
Check this out :

http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/


Cheers,
A.A.


On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:17 PM, rajkphb rajkph...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi, I am relatively new to postgresql. I did not find any detailed
 documentation on patching . Please provide me some links where i can get
 some note on postgresql patching. Why does postgres documentation does not
 have patching topic? Thanks Suhas
 --
 View this message in context: postgresql 
 patchinghttp://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/postgresql-patching-tp5770236.html
 Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list 
 archivehttp://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/PostgreSQL-admin-f2076596.htmlat
  Nabble.com.



[ADMIN] upgrades and streaming replication

2013-09-10 Thread Charles Sprickman
I just wanted to check if there are any updates on the preferred way to upgrade 
a group of servers that are using streaming replication with minimal downtime.

Mailing list messages from a year or two ago pretty much state the following:

* No current plans to come up with some new mechanism to automate this process, 
downtime is assumed.
* If you want no downtime, use one of the userspace replication solutions.
* Best option is to upgrade the master with pg_upgrade, then upgrade the slaves 
and re-copy your data.
* While it's tempting to think you could just run pg_upgrade on all hosts to 
avoid the copy step, that will not work as something in the system catalog 
changes which will break replication.
* No good options to speed up the slave copy - rsync will either use timestamps 
to figure out if a file changed (and streaming skews that), or checksumming 
(and checksumming is slow).

Is that still pretty much the situation today with 9.2 and 9.3?

Any good guides or BCPs for the standard procedure that emphasize limiting 
downtime and giving a good rollback path?

Thanks,

Charles

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin