Re: [ADMIN] postgres seems to ignore log_min_duration_statement

2008-10-14 Thread Martin A. Brooks
Guillaume Lelarge wrote: Martin A. Brooks a écrit : I _want_ the stats, however I _only_ want the stats for queries taking over 5 seconds. Well, AFAIK, you can't. Then that would seem to entirely negate the point of having the log_min_duration_statement option, from what

[ADMIN] postgres seems to ignore log_min_duration_statement

2008-10-14 Thread Martin A. Brooks
itten, buffer hit rate = 100.00% ! Local blocks: 0 read, 0 written, buffer hit rate = 0.00% ! Direct blocks: 0 read, 0 written Am I missing something obvious? Regards -- Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodymx.net/ | Anti-spam &

Re: [ADMIN] postgres seems to ignore log_min_duration_statement

2008-10-14 Thread Martin A. Brooks
Guillaume Lelarge wrote: Martin A. Brooks a écrit : However, in the log files, I'm seeing entries for all SQL executed, not just that taking 5000ms or more. For example: 2008-10-14 10:15:50 BST PID:20349 DB:vhdb LOG: statement: select * from vendors; 2008-10-14 10:15:50 BST PID:

Re: [ADMIN] postgres seems to ignore log_min_duration_statement

2008-10-14 Thread Martin A. Brooks
Vladimir Rusinov wrote: May be you have log_min_messages = debug? Please, show full logging section. I don't explicitly set that parameter in my config. The full config file can be found at http://www.antibodymx.net/postgresql.conf Thanks -- Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodym