Thanks for your attention.
What would you choose for a postgresql installation: 3 disks configured
with RAID 0 (in a self replicating SAN) over 10 disks configured with RAID
5 (also in a self replicating SAN) , we have space constraints that
prohibit us from choosing RAID 1+0.
I've been persuaded
From: Rene Romero Benavides rene.romer...@gmail.com
Date: 08/27/2013 5:35 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: [ADMIN] 3 disks configured RAID 0 over 10 disks configured in RAID 5
(self replicating SAN)
Thanks for your attention.
What would you choose
Does your controller support odd number RAID-10 i.e. RAID 1E? If so
then 3 disks in RAID-1E. Or better 10 disks in 1E
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Rene Romero Benavides
rene.romer...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your attention.
What would you choose for a postgresql installation: 3 disks
First of all, thank you so much for your valuable time.
It probably does, though we have a requirement of having available at least
twice the expected database size, and 50% of disk space overhead sounds
like too much for us to take in a replicated SAN environment and a
PostgreSQL master/slave -
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Rene Romero Benavides
rene.romer...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, thank you so much for your valuable time.
It probably does, though we have a requirement of having available at least
twice the expected database size, and 50% of disk space overhead sounds like
In your case I'd go for the 3 disk raid 0 setup.
El ago 27, 2013 11:25 p.m., Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com
escribió:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Rene Romero Benavides
rene.romer...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, thank you so much for your valuable time.
It probably does,
