On 09/19/2012 03:46 AM, Freddie Burgess wrote:
The Employee ingest behaves a bit differently - it handles transactions
programmatically, for example:
Transaction tx = session.beginTransaction();
session.save(Employee);
tx.commit();
Could
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 16:53 +, m...@suse.de wrote:
> It looks like the attempt to remove pg_upgrade's dependency on pg_config
> (http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=2815574) was
> incomplete, since contrib/pg_upgrade/exec.c still contains the line
>
> validate_exec(c
On 09/18/2012 08:26 PM, kamalnity...@gmail.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 7554
Logged by: KAMAL
Email address: kamalnity...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.0
Operating system: windows-7
Description:
i want jsp and servlet code
Apologies that this report is near trivial, and only concerns the
Windows installers by EnterpriseDB (I'm not sure where else to post
these).
With all of the current EnterpriseDB builds for Windows, several files
have inconsistent line endings, switching between so-called DOS
(CR+LF) and UNIX (LF)
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 7546
> Logged by: Stuart Bishop
> Email address: stu...@stuartbishop.net
> PostgreSQL version: 9.1.5
> Operating system: Ubuntu 12.10
> Description:
>
> I have a pri
Here is a more detailed write-up of our current problem.
We have a process that feeds three Postgresql database tables, two of which
are partitioned tables. There are no foreign key constraint dependencies
between any of these tables.
Data get parsed and subsequently ingested into these tables i
I will try to provide one, but it will have to wait till weekend.
Cheers,
Andrei
On Sep 18, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrei Tchijov writes:
>> SQL (Please let me know if you need definitions for other tables/views
>> involved):
>
> What we need is a self-contained test ca
I can't seem to reproduce this on a Ubuntu box on 9.1 or 9.2, nor can
I seem to reproduce this with less than ~8 million rows on a windows
one. I can reliably reproduce this with that many rows and the
database dump is only ~120mb so if anyone is interested I can host it
for them, otherwise I guess
Andrei Tchijov writes:
> SQL (Please let me know if you need definitions for other tables/views
> involved):
What we need is a self-contained test case.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscript
tom Tom writes:
> I can't seem to reproduce this on a Ubuntu box on 9.1 or 9.2, nor can
> I seem to reproduce this with less than ~8 million rows on a windows
> one. I can reliably reproduce this with that many rows and the
> database dump is only ~120mb so if anyone is interested I can host it
>
lal...@fhcrc.org writes:
> I have run across a situation where we are changing schema and table names
> that a view references. The view is still viewable with a select statement
> but if you try and execute the view definition contained within the
> pg_catalog.pg_views, then it fails.
This appear
Hi,
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 15:29 +, dsoren...@atlasit.com wrote:
> We are trying to install ora2pg using the postgresql RHEL5 repo but get
> depsolving problems.
>
> Linux server 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 28 01:54:56 EDT 2012 x86_64
> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> [root@server ~/]# yu
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 7555
Logged by: Daniel
Email address: dsoren...@atlasit.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.2.0
Operating system: RHEL 5.8
Description:
Hello,
We are trying to install ora2pg using the postgresql RHEL5 repo but g
No. But the form for entering bugs is not very ... sophisticated.
Thanks for pointing me to this wiki, I will re-submit properly.
Cheers,
Andrei
On Sep 17, 2012, at 11:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> and...@tchijov.com writes:
>> In a view (can provide source upon request) where condition
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 7554
Logged by: KAMAL
Email address: kamalnity...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.0
Operating system: windows-7
Description:
i want jsp and servlet code for save image.i found problem but
size 0kb.
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 7553
Logged by: Lloyd Albin
Email address: lal...@fhcrc.org
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.7
Operating system: SUSE Linux (64-bit)
Description:
I have run across a situation where we are changing schema and tab
Hi,
I have a view (see SQL at the end of this e-mail). Query like following works
without any problems on 9.0 and 9.1.
select * form v_jobs where rdms_job_number = 41771;
However, on 9.2 this query acts as it is
select * form v_jobs;
It seems that this problem occur only
On Tuesday, September 18, 2012 6:03 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> To define the behavior correctly, according to me there are 2 options
now:
>
>> Approach-1 :
>> Document that both(sender and receiver) the timeout parameters should be
>> greater than
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> To define the behavior correctly, according to me there are 2 options now:
>
> Approach-1 :
> Document that both(sender and receiver) the timeout parameters should be
> greater than wal_receiver_status_interval.
> If both are greater, then I th
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> On 18.09.2012 09:46, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>
>> On 09/18/2012 07:57 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>>
>>> If you change the max_connections on the master, you need to take a
>>> fresh backup from the master and start the standby from it.
>>
>>
>
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 09/18/2012 07:57 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>> If you change the max_connections on the master, you need to take a
>> fresh backup from the master and start the standby from it.
>>
>
> WTF, really?
>
> What else breaks the replication and fo
21 matches
Mail list logo
