Re: [BUGS] BUG #1854: SQL Bug

2005-08-29 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:11:06AM -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Christian Almeida wrote: > > Should this sql work? > > Yes and no. ;) Whether this errors or adds the reference is controlled by > a configuration variable, add_missing_from. For backwards compatibility > reaso

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1854: SQL Bug

2005-08-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:11:06 -0700, Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Christian Almeida wrote: > > > Should this sql work? > > Yes and no. ;) Whether this errors or adds the reference is controlled by > a configuration variable, add_missing_from. For backw

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1854: SQL Bug

2005-08-29 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Christian Almeida wrote: > Should this sql work? Yes and no. ;) Whether this errors or adds the reference is controlled by a configuration variable, add_missing_from. For backwards compatibility reasons (and for allowing outside table references in delete) the variable cur

[BUGS] BUG #1854: SQL Bug

2005-08-29 Thread Christian Almeida
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 1854 Logged by: Christian Almeida Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.0 Operating system: Windows XP SP2 Description:SQL Bug Details: Should this sql work? I just picked 3 tables from pg_ca