On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Kevin Field wrote:
> On May 8, 9:11 am, Kevin Field wrote:
>> On May 4, 2:10 pm, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>>
>> > The installer is still looking for perl58.dll, whilst the server
>> > needs perl510.dll. I've committed a fix for that (and the other PLs
On May 22, 9:28 am, Kevin Field wrote:
> On May 8, 9:11 am, Kevin Field wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 4, 2:10 pm, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>
> > > The installer is still looking for perl58.dll, whilst the server
> > > needs perl510.dll. I've committed a fix for that (and the other PLs
> >
On May 8, 9:11 am, Kevin Field wrote:
> On May 4, 2:10 pm, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>
> > The installer is still looking for perl58.dll, whilst the server
> > needs perl510.dll. I've committed a fix for that (and the other PLs
> > which were similarly afflicted).
>
> > I've rebuilt th
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
> Okay, I uninstalled both 5.8 and 5.10, installed 5.10 fresh, and it
> doesn't detect it during install. I tried another fresh install of
> 5.10 with PerlScript. Same deal. Now I'm trying a fresh install with
> all options checked. Still no
On May 2, 12:11 pm, Kevin Field wrote:
> On May 2, 12:09 pm, Kevin Field wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 1, 12:41 pm, Kevin Field wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 26, 2:08 pm, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>
> > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Kevin Field
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On Apr 24, 9:32 am,
On May 2, 12:09 pm, Kevin Field wrote:
> On May 1, 12:41 pm, Kevin Field wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 26, 2:08 pm, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Kevin Field
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Apr 24, 9:32 am, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>
> > > >> I don'
On May 1, 12:41 pm, Kevin Field wrote:
> On Apr 26, 2:08 pm, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Kevin Field
> > wrote:
> > > On Apr 24, 9:32 am, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>
> > >> I don't know if there is any way we can solve it, except by reve
On Apr 26, 2:08 pm, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Kevin Field
> wrote:
> > On Apr 24, 9:32 am, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>
> >> I don't know if there is any way we can solve it, except by reverting
> >> back to 5.8 or advising users to use only
I found an additional message in the Application Event Log:
2009-04-17 12:05:00 GMT FATAL: could not create lock file
"postmaster.pid": Permission denied
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsq
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
> On Apr 24, 9:32 am, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>>
>> I don't know if there is any way we can solve it, except by reverting
>> back to 5.8 or advising users to use only one version.
>
> I just had an idea--at least in the ActiveState d
On Apr 24, 9:32 am, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>
> I don't know if there is any way we can solve it, except by reverting
> back to 5.8 or advising users to use only one version.
I just had an idea--at least in the ActiveState distributions (not
sure about Strawberry or Vanilla) they incl
On Apr 24, 9:32 am, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>
> I don't know if there is any way we can solve it, except by reverting
> back to 5.8 or advising users to use only one version.
LOL...ah, great. Well, I'd love to move to 5.10 for both.
A note in the docs would be handy either way.
--
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
> On Apr 24, 8:40 am, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>> >
>> > So I need to keep my 5.8 around currently for other uses--how can I
>> > hint at the correct location for it?
>>
>> In theory, by setting the path for the server only. In practi
On Apr 24, 8:40 am, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
> >
> > So I need to keep my 5.8 around currently for other uses--how can I
> > hint at the correct location for it?
>
> In theory, by setting the path for the server only. In practice I'm
> not sure how you could do that, except by possibly
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
> Good to know. And yay for 5.10! That's a welcome upgrade.
>
> So I need to keep my 5.8 around currently for other uses--how can I
> hint at the correct location for it?
In theory, by setting the path for the server only. In practice I'm
not
On Apr 23, 2:25 pm, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Kevin Field
> wrote:
> > On Apr 23, 12:13 pm, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Kevin Field
> >> wrote:
> >> > Is it possible it's looking for Perl in the wrong p
On Apr 23, 11:30 am, Kevin Field wrote:
>
> pg_restore: WARNING: database "production" does not exist
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC:
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 519; 2612 47275
> PROCEDURAL LANGUAGE plperl mysuperuser
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)]
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
> On Apr 23, 12:13 pm, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Kevin Field
>> wrote:
>> > Is it possible it's looking for Perl in the wrong place? (Hence the
>> > "No such file..." error that somehow makes it b
On Apr 23, 12:13 pm, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Kevin Field
> wrote:
> > Is it possible it's looking for Perl in the wrong place? (Hence the
> > "No such file..." error that somehow makes it back to my Perl script?)
>
> What version of perl do you hav
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
> Is it possible it's looking for Perl in the wrong place? (Hence the
> "No such file..." error that somehow makes it back to my Perl script?)
What version of perl do you have?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
> However, after that when I try to run a script to dump another database and
> restore it onto the beta, I get a "file not found" error, which is really
> odd both because it was working fine on the 2009-03-24 build and because the
> permissions have not changed. Aside from that, which is it's ow
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4763
Logged by: Kevin Field
Email address: k...@brantaero.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.4-beta1
Operating system: Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition SP2
Description:postgres service unstable, even during install
D
22 matches
Mail list logo
