Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm getting some odd results when running two generate_series calls in a
> SELECT ...
> When the row counts differ you get the least common multiple number of
> rows.
Yup, this is the expected or at least historical behavior. It's not
entirely clear what
I'm getting some odd results when running two generate_series calls in a
SELECT. When the two calls return the same number of rows you get that
many rows out:
# SELECT generate_series(1,3), generate_series(1,3);
generate_series | generate_series
-+-
