Re: [BUGS] [Feed-back] Installing PostgreSQL 8.0.0 on SPARC/Solaris.

2005-02-07 Thread Rolf Sponsel
Okay, I've now succeeded to build with default runtime paths built/linked in, although not using the optimal solution (see end of this message). Please see further comments in-lined below ... Rolf Sponsel, 2005-02-04 23:26 GMT +01:00, wrote: Tom Lane, 2005-02-01 04:45 GMT +01:00, wrote: Rolf Sponse

Re: [BUGS] [Feed-back] Installing PostgreSQL 8.0.0 on SPARC/Solaris.

2005-02-07 Thread Rolf Sponsel
Tom Lane, 2005-02-01 04:45 GMT +01:00, wrote: Rolf Sponsel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: From my understanding, the preferred way for Solaris is to only set LD_RUN_PATH, and avoid setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH, at link-time. This is what I usually do. And usually works very well. No, the preferred thing is

Re: [BUGS] [Feed-back] Installing PostgreSQL 8.0.0 on SPARC/Solaris. Configure and install issues.

2005-02-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane wrote: > Rolf Sponsel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > From my understanding, the preferred way > > for Solaris is to only set LD_RUN_PATH, > > and avoid setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH, at > > link-time. This is what I usually do. > > No, the preferred thing is to set -rpath within the executable

Re: [BUGS] [Feed-back] Installing PostgreSQL 8.0.0 on SPARC/Solaris. Configure and install issues.

2005-01-31 Thread Tom Lane
Rolf Sponsel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > From my understanding, the preferred way > for Solaris is to only set LD_RUN_PATH, > and avoid setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH, at > link-time. This is what I usually do. No, the preferred thing is to set -rpath within the executable, which we do already (see Ma