On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Piergiorgio Buongiovanni
> wrote:
>> I reused the previous command to re-set the sequence value to the right one,
>> but I see that the START value is now 59100. I reused the previous command
>> another time and t
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Piergiorgio Buongiovanni
wrote:
> I reused the previous command to re-set the sequence value to the right one,
> but I see that the START value is now 59100. I reused the previous command
> another time and the START value is now 30440.
>
> I think this is a bug. I
