Using the dll from the link that Hiroshi posted actually fixed v1 in my
case (though perhaps it's just an unrelated side-effect caused by using
a different random number generator which might be slower???). Thanks!
Anyhow, I would have expected v1 to work fine in this case too as the
ossp-uui
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Hiroshi Saito
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Please this.
> http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/msvc/
Ahh, a makefile - that makes things somewhat clearer :-)
Thanks - I've updated the build machine so future releases will
include this fix.
--
Dave
Hi.
Please this.
http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/msvc/
P.S)
sorry,
It did not have a machine, when it mailed with you before.
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Hiroshi Saito
<[EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Hiroshi Saito
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Um, I will arrange information and write wiki. . Is it a suitable place?
A README file at http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/ would be enough.
> This is some information. http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSS
Hi.
Um, I will arrange information and write wiki. .
Is it a suitable place?
This is some information.
http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/
uuid-ossp.dll(MinGW compile) is this.
http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/pg8.3.3-win-bin-uuid-ossp.zip
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
- Origi
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Hiroshi Saito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Sorry, late the information.
> My patch was applied after the review of Ralf-san. However, The timing of a
> release was different. Then, patch is only current CVS-HEAD.
> http://cvs.ossp.org/chngview?cn=6001
>
Hi.
Sorry, late the information.
My patch was applied after the review of Ralf-san. However, The timing of a
release was different. Then, patch is only current CVS-HEAD.
http://cvs.ossp.org/chngview?cn=6001
I thought that this problem was very important. It was sufficient reason to
apply
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps the v4 generation method would work better for you?
> actually this has been reported before and seems to be an issue in the
> windows port of the ossp-uuid library:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2008-05/m
Tom Lane wrote:
Meetesh Karia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
As best as I can tell, the problem is caused because generation of v1
UUIDs uses GetSystemTimeAsFileTime which is stated to have a resolution
of 100 nanoseconds but in practice has a resolution of around 15ms
(http://www.ddj.com/showArt
Meetesh Karia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As best as I can tell, the problem is caused because generation of v1
> UUIDs uses GetSystemTimeAsFileTime which is stated to have a resolution
> of 100 nanoseconds but in practice has a resolution of around 15ms
> (http://www.ddj.com/showArticle.jhtml
10 matches
Mail list logo
