Re: [BUGS] upcoming 7.4 relaese: absent recode() function ?

2003-08-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Also, Tom, we had this item on TODO for a while, so people were using it in the past, they would have squaked about the idea of removing it: * -Remove Cyrillic recode support --- Tom Lane wrote: > Ruslan A Dautkhano

Re: [BUGS] Follow up: range query with timestamp returns different result with index than without (7.3.3)

2003-08-09 Thread Tom Lane
Christian van der Leeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The db itself (only speaking for the current 7.3.4 build), > is not configured with enabled-integer-datetimes. Okay ... [experiments a bit...] ah-hah, I know what happened. Under the hood, that value is a NaN. Observe: -- just to ease exper

[BUGS] upcoming 7.4 relaese: absent recode() function ?

2003-08-09 Thread Ruslan A Dautkhanov
From the latest [EMAIL PROTECTED] message The --enable-recode feature was removed due to its brokenness with the IPv6 changes and an apparent lack of anyone actually using it. Is this mean, that PostgresSQL will not have recode() futher ? Some my programs use following form of the recode: r