Hello
When I try build template0 I get err. message. I updated source
today.
initializing pg_depend ... ok
creating system views ... ok
loading pg_description ... ok
creating conversions ... ok
setting privileges on built-in objects ... ERROR: catalog is missing 104
attribute(s) for re
Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I try build template0 I get err. message. I updated source
> today.
Did you do a full rebuild ("make clean" or "make distclean")?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > When I try build template0 I get err. message. I updated source
> > today.
>
> Did you do a full rebuild ("make clean" or "make distclean")?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Yes, I did make di
Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I did make distclean
Hmm. I just did a cvs update, make distclean, etc and it initdb's and
passes regression tests just fine, using RHL 8.0. What's your platform?
Given recent discussion, it might be particularly interesting to ask
what version of
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, I did make distclean
>
> Hmm. I just did a cvs update, make distclean, etc and it initdb's and
> passes regression tests just fine, using RHL 8.0. What's your platform?
> Given recent discussion, it might b
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In both cases, the CHECK constraint uses a function that is stable or
> volatile. It was suggested that functions used in CHECK constraints be
> restricted to immutable,
This seems reasonable to me. I'm a bit surprised we do not have such a
check
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 20:28:02 -0500,
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In both cases, the CHECK constraint uses a function that is stable or
> > volatile. It was suggested that functions used in CHECK constraints be
> > restricted to imm
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 20:43, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In both cases, the CHECK constraint uses a function that is stable or
volatile. It was suggested that fun
