[BUGS] soname of libpq

2004-05-18 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
Hi *, I don't know if this is really a bug but surely is something that is giving a lot of problems to psycopg (pyhton/postgresql adapter). psycopg 1.1.11+ checks for libpq version at runtime and, if available uses the new protocol api (mainly to extract non-localized error codes after errors). no

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1142: Problem with update permissions for view

2004-05-18 Thread Arturs Zoldners
Dear Tom, On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 19:48, Tom Lane wrote: > Arturs Zoldners <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > -- The following rule prevents user x to update public_data: > > CREATE RULE log_public AS ON UPDATE TO private_data WHERE (new.a <> > > old.a) DO INSERT INTO private_log (old_val, new_val) VA

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1142: Problem with update permissions for view

2004-05-18 Thread Tom Lane
Arturs Zoldners <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I found another bug, which sounds very like the first one: Hm, looks like no one ever experimented with permissions checking for subqueries in a rule WHERE clause before. Fixed - thanks for the report! regards, tom lane -

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures

2004-05-18 Thread Tom Lane
Fabien COELHO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For the TODO, I would suggest something general: > - fix grant/revoke wrt SQL standard, validate errors, warnings and successes. I have a patch-in-progress that addresses these issues. I didn't get it quite finished before leaving for vacation, but hope

Re: [BUGS] Patch for not going beyond NOFILE system limit

2004-05-18 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We have already fixed this in CVS and the fix will be in 7.5: I don't think that the previous changes address what the complainant seems to really want, viz not even *try* to exceed RLIMIT_NOFILE. However the patch certainly must be rejected since (a) i