Re: [BUGS] BUG #5063: MS Access crashes by quiting after linking tables with PostgreSQL

2009-09-21 Thread Annita Veneti
Matt first thanks for the reply, I have check the log and it says Relation »msysconf« existiert nicht (that it doesn’t exist. I know that there is a setting in the pgAdmin to postgre create the table if it not there. But I cannot find it , do you have any idea? Annita -Ursprüngliche

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-21 Thread Tim Bunce
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:00:01PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > There's a definitional problem here however. When should we call the > destructor? My impression is that it should happen when the calling > query terminates, not when the backend shuts down. I'm sure this will > cause other issue

[BUGS] BUG #5070: Drop cascade fails on 8.4

2009-09-21 Thread Cedric Berger
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5070 Logged by: Cedric Berger Email address: ced...@berger.to PostgreSQL version: 8.4.1 Operating system: Mac OS X, 10.6.1 Description:Drop cascade fails on 8.4 Details: I've a schema with actually 409 tables

[BUGS] Drop schema cascade fails since postgresql 8.4

2009-09-21 Thread Cedric Berger
Hi, I've a schema with actually 409 tables. I've made a default installation of postgresql on the mac (Installer version Version 8.4.1-1 from enterprise db). Unfortunately, since I upgraded from 8.3, I cannot drop these kind of schema anymore: postgres=# drop schema hard_12 cascade postgres-#

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5070: Drop cascade fails on 8.4

2009-09-21 Thread Tom Lane
"Cedric Berger" writes: > I've a schema with actually 409 tables. > I've made a default installation of postgresql on the mac > (Installer version Version 8.4.1-1 from enterprise db). > Unfortunately, since I upgraded from 8.3, I cannot drop > these kind of schema anymore: > postgres=# drop sch

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-21 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:05:43AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:00:01PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > There's a definitional problem here however. When should we call the > > destructor? My impression is that it should happen when the calling > > query terminates, not w

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
David Fetter escribió: > Taken literally, that would mean, "the last action before the backend > exits," but at least to me, that sounds troubling for the same reasons > that "end of transaction" triggers do. What happens when there are > two different END blocks in a session? The manual is clea

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5053: domain constraints still leak

2009-09-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
Sam Mason wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:54:07AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: > > Sam Mason wrote: > > > the deeper problem seems to be that the table was created as: > > > > > > create table test (a tstdom); > > > > > > and not as: > > > > > > create table test (a tstdom not null); >

Re: [BUGS] Drop schema cascade fails since postgresql 8.4

2009-09-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Cedric Berger wrote: > postgres=# drop schema hard_12 cascade > postgres-# ; > WARNING: out of shared memory > ERROR: out of shared memory > HINT: You might need to increase max_locks_per_transaction. > > I've tried to double max_locks_per_transaction, double the values > of SHMMAX/SHMALL

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-21 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:06:30PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > David Fetter escribió: > > > Taken literally, that would mean, "the last action before the > > backend exits," but at least to me, that sounds troubling for the > > same reasons that "end of transaction" triggers do. What happens >

[BUGS] Problem installing Postgres 8.4.1

2009-09-21 Thread Christine Penner
Hi, I posted the following message to the General list a while ago. I am still not able to run postgres at all. I am trying to install Postgres 8.4. I had 8.3 installed. Because I didn't have any important data, to make it easier I removed 8.3, the data directory, removed the Postgres windows u

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
David Fetter escribió: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:06:30PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > David Fetter escribió: > > > > > Taken literally, that would mean, "the last action before the > > > backend exits," but at least to me, that sounds troubling for the > > > same reasons that "end of transa

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > David Fetter escribió: > >> Taken literally, that would mean, "the last action before the backend >> exits," but at least to me, that sounds troubling for the same reasons >> that "end of transaction" triggers do.  What happens when there a

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5053: domain constraints still leak

2009-09-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Sam Mason wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:54:07AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> > Sam Mason wrote: >> > > the deeper problem seems to be that the table was created as: >> > > >> > >   create table test (a tstdom); >> > > >> > > and n

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-21 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:06:17PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > David Fetter escribió: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:06:30PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > David Fetter escribió: > > > > > > > Taken literally, that would mean, "the last action before the > > > > backend exits," but at least

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:17 PM, David Fetter wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:06:17PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> David Fetter escribió: >> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:06:30PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> > > David Fetter escribió: >> > > >> > > > Taken literally, that would mean, "the

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-21 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:28:11PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:17 PM, David Fetter wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:06:17PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> David Fetter escribió: > >> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:06:30PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> > > David

Re: [BUGS] Problem installing Postgres 8.4.1

2009-09-21 Thread Sachin Srivastava
On 09/21/2009 08:31 PM, Christine Penner wrote: Hi, I posted the following message to the General list a while ago. I am still not able to run postgres at all. I am trying to install Postgres 8.4. I had 8.3 installed. Because I didn't have any important data, to make it easier I remo

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
David Fetter escribió: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:06:17PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > The fine manual saith > > > > You may have multiple "END" blocks within a file--they will > > execute in reverse order of definition; that is: last in, first > > out (LIFO). > > > > But then,

Re: [BUGS] Problem installing Postgres 8.4.1

2009-09-21 Thread Christine Penner
At 11:57 AM 21/09/2009, you wrote: What error you get when you run initdb?? (Also what exact command you run?) The first time I just double clicked on the file initdb.exe. Just now I tried to run it through the command prompt and go this, this is the same stuff that was in the log file in the

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > David Fetter escribió: >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:06:17PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> > The fine manual saith >> > >> >     You may have multiple "END" blocks within a file--they will >> >     execute in reverse order of definition;

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5063: MS Access crashes by quiting after linking tables with PostgreSQL

2009-09-21 Thread Matt Taylor
I think the msysconf error is not related to your issue: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgadmin-support/2002-01/msg00035.php Can you query data from the data source using MS Excel? Matt Annita Veneti wrote: Matt first thanks for the reply, I have check the log and it says Relation »msy

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-21 Thread Tom Lane
David Fetter writes: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:06:30PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> With connection poolers, backends can last quite awhile. Is it OK >>> for the END block to run hours after the rest of the code? >> >> This is an interesting point -- should END blocks be called on >> DISC

[BUGS] BUG #5071: abbrev() bug with IPv6

2009-09-21 Thread
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5071 Logged by: Email address: alexander.o...@koeln.de PostgreSQL version: 8.3.7 Operating system: Debian Lenny 64Bit Description:abbrev() bug with IPv6 Details: I have a Database to store IPV6 addresses. Fie