On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Thomas Munro
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> On 2017-11-30 08:06:44 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
At the current rate of failure I'm slightly inclined to just leave the
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2017-11-30 08:06:44 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> At the current rate of failure I'm slightly inclined to just leave the
>>> occasionally failing test, which sounds like an actual bu
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-11-30 08:06:44 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> At the current rate of failure I'm slightly inclined to just leave the
>> occasionally failing test, which sounds like an actual bug imo, in place
>> till we have the fix. But if there's a
On 2017-11-30 08:06:44 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017-11-30 23:53:55 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Thomas Munro
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Andres Freund writes:
> > >>> Add some regression tests that
Fix uninitialized-variable compiler warning induced by commit e4128ee76.
I'm a little bit astonished that anyone's compiler would have failed to
complain about this. The compiler surely does not know that is_procedure
means the function return value will be ignored.
Branch
--
master
Details
