I wrote:
> Anyway, it looks like we should write off these longfin timings as
> ambient noise :-(
Here's a possibly more useful graph of regression test timings over
the last year. I pulled this from the buildfarm database: it is the
reported runtime for the "installcheck-C" step in each successf
Move handling of database properties from pg_dumpall into pg_dump.
This patch rearranges the division of labor between pg_dump and pg_dumpall
so that pg_dump itself handles all properties attached to a single
database. Notably, a database's ACL (GRANT/REVOKE status) and local GUC
settings establi
Reorder code in pg_dump to dump comments etc in a uniform order.
Most of the code in pg_dump dumps an object's comment, security label,
and ACL auxiliary TOC entries, in that order, immediately after the
object's main TOC entry, and at least dumpComment's API spec says this
isn't optional. dumpDa
PL/Python: Fix tests for older Python versions
Commit 8561e4840c81f7e345be2df170839846814fa004 neglected to handle
older Python versions that don't support the "with" statement. So write
the tests in a way that older versions can handle as well.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.
Make pg_dump's ACL, sec label, and comment entries reliably identifiable.
_tocEntryRequired() expects that it can identify ACL, SECURITY LABEL,
and COMMENT TOC entries that are for large objects by seeing whether
the tag for them starts with "LARGE OBJECT ". While that works fine
for actual large
Make pg_dump's ACL, sec label, and comment entries reliably identifiable.
_tocEntryRequired() expects that it can identify ACL, SECURITY LABEL,
and COMMENT TOC entries that are for large objects by seeing whether
the tag for them starts with "LARGE OBJECT ". While that works fine
for actual large
Make pg_dump's ACL, sec label, and comment entries reliably identifiable.
_tocEntryRequired() expects that it can identify ACL, SECURITY LABEL,
and COMMENT TOC entries that are for large objects by seeing whether
the tag for them starts with "LARGE OBJECT ". While that works fine
for actual large
Make pg_dump's ACL, sec label, and comment entries reliably identifiable.
_tocEntryRequired() expects that it can identify ACL, SECURITY LABEL,
and COMMENT TOC entries that are for large objects by seeing whether
the tag for them starts with "LARGE OBJECT ". While that works fine
for actual large
Make pg_dump's ACL, sec label, and comment entries reliably identifiable.
_tocEntryRequired() expects that it can identify ACL, SECURITY LABEL,
and COMMENT TOC entries that are for large objects by seeing whether
the tag for them starts with "LARGE OBJECT ". While that works fine
for actual large
Make pg_dump's ACL, sec label, and comment entries reliably identifiable.
_tocEntryRequired() expects that it can identify ACL, SECURITY LABEL,
and COMMENT TOC entries that are for large objects by seeing whether
the tag for them starts with "LARGE OBJECT ". While that works fine
for actual large
Thomas Munro writes:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:17 PM, Thomas Munro
> wrote:
>> It looks to me like longfin's average and
>> variation increased half way between fa330f9a and 18042840, somewhere
>> near Dec 7 to 9, when we went from ~40s +/- 1 to ~50s with several
>> seconds' variation. Was th
Transaction control in PL procedures
In each of the supplied procedural languages (PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl,
PL/Python, PL/Tcl), add language-specific commit and rollback
functions/commands to control transactions in procedures in that
language. Add similar underlying functions to SPI. Some additional
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:17 PM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> It looks to me like longfin's average and
> variation increased half way between fa330f9a and 18042840, somewhere
> near Dec 7 to 9, when we went from ~40s +/- 1 to ~50s with several
> seconds' variation. Was there some other environmental c
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro writes:
>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Aside from the instability problems, I'm pretty unhappy about how much
>>> the PHJ patch has added to the runtime of "make check". I do not think
>>> any one feature c
Fix docs typo
Spotted by Thomas Munro
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/b9ff79b8f17697f3df492017d454caa9920a7183
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/config.sgml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
15 matches
Mail list logo