Tag refs/tags/REL9_6_8 was created.
Tag refs/tags/REL9_3_22 was created.
Tag refs/tags/REL9_4_17 was created.
Tag refs/tags/REL9_5_12 was created.
Tag refs/tags/REL_10_3 was created.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:32 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Attached patch does this. I cannot recreate this issue locally, but
>> this should still fix it on skink.
>
> Committed.
Looks like it worked.
--
Peter Geoghegan
Fix up ecpg's configuration so it handles "long long int" in MSVC builds.
Although configure-based builds correctly define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT when
appropriate (in both pg_config.h and ecpg_config.h), builds using the MSVC
scripts failed to do so. This currently has no impact on the backend,
since
Fix up ecpg's configuration so it handles "long long int" in MSVC builds.
Although configure-based builds correctly define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT when
appropriate (in both pg_config.h and ecpg_config.h), builds using the MSVC
scripts failed to do so. This currently has no impact on the backend,
since
Fix up ecpg's configuration so it handles "long long int" in MSVC builds.
Although configure-based builds correctly define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT when
appropriate (in both pg_config.h and ecpg_config.h), builds using the MSVC
scripts failed to do so. This currently has no impact on the backend,
since
Fix up ecpg's configuration so it handles "long long int" in MSVC builds.
Although configure-based builds correctly define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT when
appropriate (in both pg_config.h and ecpg_config.h), builds using the MSVC
scripts failed to do so. This currently has no impact on the backend,
since
Fix up ecpg's configuration so it handles "long long int" in MSVC builds.
Although configure-based builds correctly define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT when
appropriate (in both pg_config.h and ecpg_config.h), builds using the MSVC
scripts failed to do so. This currently has no impact on the backend,
since
Fix up ecpg's configuration so it handles "long long int" in MSVC builds.
Although configure-based builds correctly define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT when
appropriate (in both pg_config.h and ecpg_config.h), builds using the MSVC
scripts failed to do so. This currently has no impact on the backend,
since
Use the correct tuplestore read pointer in a NamedTuplestoreScan.
Tom Kazimiers reported that transition tables don't work correctly when
they are scanned by more than one executor node. That's because commit
18ce3a4ab allocated separate read pointers for each executor node, as it
must, but faile
Use the correct tuplestore read pointer in a NamedTuplestoreScan.
Tom Kazimiers reported that transition tables don't work correctly when
they are scanned by more than one executor node. That's because commit
18ce3a4ab allocated separate read pointers for each executor node, as it
must, but faile
Remove regression tests' CREATE FUNCTION commands for unused C functions.
I removed these functions altogether in HEAD, in commit db3af9feb, and
it emerges that that causes trouble for cross-branch upgrade testing.
We could put back stub functions but that seems pretty silly. Instead,
back-patch
Remove regression tests' CREATE FUNCTION commands for unused C functions.
I removed these functions altogether in HEAD, in commit db3af9feb, and
it emerges that that causes trouble for cross-branch upgrade testing.
We could put back stub functions but that seems pretty silly. Instead,
back-patch
Remove regression tests' CREATE FUNCTION commands for unused C functions.
I removed these functions altogether in HEAD, in commit db3af9feb, and
it emerges that that causes trouble for cross-branch upgrade testing.
We could put back stub functions but that seems pretty silly. Instead,
back-patch
Remove regression tests' CREATE FUNCTION commands for unused C functions.
I removed these functions altogether in HEAD, in commit db3af9feb, and
it emerges that that causes trouble for cross-branch upgrade testing.
We could put back stub functions but that seems pretty silly. Instead,
back-patch
Remove regression tests' CREATE FUNCTION commands for unused C functions.
I removed these functions altogether in HEAD, in commit db3af9feb, and
it emerges that that causes trouble for cross-branch upgrade testing.
We could put back stub functions but that seems pretty silly. Instead,
back-patch
Revert renaming of int44in/int44out.
This seemed like a good idea in commit be42eb9d6, but it causes more
trouble than it's worth for cross-branch upgrade testing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/c
doc: Fix grammar.
Michael Paquier
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6614aaa699bcff77fbcbc349fc678b8bfb060b9a
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml | 2 +-
1 file ch
Prevent dangling-pointer access when update trigger returns old tuple.
A before-update row trigger may choose to return the "new" or "old" tuple
unmodified. ExecBRUpdateTriggers failed to consider the second
possibility, and would proceed to free the "old" tuple even if it was the
one returned, l
Prevent dangling-pointer access when update trigger returns old tuple.
A before-update row trigger may choose to return the "new" or "old" tuple
unmodified. ExecBRUpdateTriggers failed to consider the second
possibility, and would proceed to free the "old" tuple even if it was the
one returned, l
Prevent dangling-pointer access when update trigger returns old tuple.
A before-update row trigger may choose to return the "new" or "old" tuple
unmodified. ExecBRUpdateTriggers failed to consider the second
possibility, and would proceed to free the "old" tuple even if it was the
one returned, l
Prevent dangling-pointer access when update trigger returns old tuple.
A before-update row trigger may choose to return the "new" or "old" tuple
unmodified. ExecBRUpdateTriggers failed to consider the second
possibility, and would proceed to free the "old" tuple even if it was the
one returned, l
Prevent dangling-pointer access when update trigger returns old tuple.
A before-update row trigger may choose to return the "new" or "old" tuple
unmodified. ExecBRUpdateTriggers failed to consider the second
possibility, and would proceed to free the "old" tuple even if it was the
one returned, l
Prevent dangling-pointer access when update trigger returns old tuple.
A before-update row trigger may choose to return the "new" or "old" tuple
unmodified. ExecBRUpdateTriggers failed to consider the second
possibility, and would proceed to free the "old" tuple even if it was the
one returned, l
Minor cleanup of code related to partially_grouped_rel.
Jeevan Chalke
Discussion:
http://postgr.es/m/CAM2+6=x9kxqol2zqz00e6asbt9z+rfywbomhxj0+8fpaymz...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/5e6a63c0d1028b9950c9cbcd7aaf9f2a67880a8d
Modifi
Fix logic error in add_paths_to_partial_grouping_rel.
Commit 3bf05e096b9f8375e640c5d7996aa57efd7f240c sometimes uses the
cheapest_partial_path variable in this function to mean the cheapest
one from the input rel and at other times the cheapest one from the
partially grouped rel, but it never rese
Improve regression test coverage of regress.c.
It's a bit silly to have test functions that aren't tested, so test
them.
In passing, rename int44in/int44out to city_budget_in/_out so that they
match how the regression tests use them. Also, fix city_budget_out
so that it emits the format city_bud
Remove unused functions in regress.c.
This patch removes five functions that presumably were once used in the
regression tests, but haven't been so used in many years. Nonetheless
we've been wasting maintenance effort on them (e.g., by converting them
to V1 function protocol). I see no reason to
Revert restructuring of bin/scripts/Makefile
The Makefile portion of 91f3ffc5249eff99c311fb27e7b29a44d9c62be1 broke
the MSVC build. This patch reverts the changes to the Makefile and
adjusts it to work with the new code, while keeping the actual code
changes from the original patch.
Author: Victo
Revert restructuring of bin/scripts/Makefile
The Makefile portion of 91f3ffc5249eff99c311fb27e7b29a44d9c62be1 broke
the MSVC build. This patch reverts the changes to the Makefile and
adjusts it to work with the new code, while keeping the actual code
changes from the original patch.
Author: Victo
Revert restructuring of bin/scripts/Makefile
The Makefile portion of 91f3ffc5249eff99c311fb27e7b29a44d9c62be1 broke
the MSVC build. This patch reverts the changes to the Makefile and
adjusts it to work with the new code, while keeping the actual code
changes from the original patch.
Author: Victo
34 matches
Mail list logo