Add tab completion for EXPLAIN (SETTINGS) in psql
Author: Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Tatsuro Yamada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190927022051.gc24...@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 12
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4b011cad272e997935eb8d80ab7
Add tab completion for EXPLAIN (SETTINGS) in psql
Author: Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Tatsuro Yamada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190927022051.gc24...@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 12
Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/268c4e9d4d88f5b4baca
Fix oversight in commit 4429f6a9e3e12bb4af6e3677fbc78cd80f160252.
The test name and the following test cases suggest the index created
should be hash index, but it forgot to add 'using hash' in the test case.
This in itself won't improve code coverage as there were some other tests
which were cove
Fix oversight in commit 4429f6a9e3e12bb4af6e3677fbc78cd80f160252.
The test name and the following test cases suggest the index created
should be hash index, but it forgot to add 'using hash' in the test case.
This in itself won't improve code coverage as there were some other tests
which were cove
Fix oversight in commit 4429f6a9e3e12bb4af6e3677fbc78cd80f160252.
The test name and the following test cases suggest the index created
should be hash index, but it forgot to add 'using hash' in the test case.
This in itself won't improve code coverage as there were some other tests
which were cove
Fix oversight in commit 4429f6a9e3e12bb4af6e3677fbc78cd80f160252.
The test name and the following test cases suggest the index created
should be hash index, but it forgot to add 'using hash' in the test case.
This in itself won't improve code coverage as there were some other tests
which were cove
Fix oversight in commit 4429f6a9e3e12bb4af6e3677fbc78cd80f160252.
The test name and the following test cases suggest the index created
should be hash index, but it forgot to add 'using hash' in the test case.
This in itself won't improve code coverage as there were some other tests
which were cove
Fix oversight in commit 4429f6a9e3e12bb4af6e3677fbc78cd80f160252.
The test name and the following test cases suggest the index created
should be hash index, but it forgot to add 'using hash' in the test case.
This in itself won't improve code coverage as there were some other tests
which were cove
Fix oversight in commit 4429f6a9e3e12bb4af6e3677fbc78cd80f160252.
The test name and the following test cases suggest the index created
should be hash index, but it forgot to add 'using hash' in the test case.
This in itself won't improve code coverage as there were some other tests
which were cove
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:19:47PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Thanks for fixing. It all looks correct to me.
Thanks for double-checking.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello, sorry I didn't notice this email.
On 2019-Sep-26, Michael Paquier wrote:
> This part from commit 773df88 is incorrect:
> + /*
> +* Set the default lock mode for this option. There is no actual way
> +* for a module to enforce it when declaring a custom relation option,
> +*
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 08:41:52AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Do you mind if I apply the attached to fix the issue? Or perhaps you
> would prefer fixing the issue yourself? I noted some inconsistencies
> with the rest while on it (please see attached).
And applied as of fbfa566.
--
Michael
Fix lockmode initialization for custom relation options
The code was enforcing AccessExclusiveLock for all custom relation
options, which is incorrect as the APIs allow a custom lock level to be
set.
While on it, fix a couple of inconsistencies in the tests and the README
of dummy_index_am.
Over
doc: Fix whitespace in markup
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/8190164e82ae03bde80864ab0941794a90e70483
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/func.sgml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
doc: Format example JSON data better
Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/79504cfe1b23cd22c78dd5786f81f40905c5cce0
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/func.sgml | 15 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
doc: Format example JSON data better
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6c3ef7482f2bdedc68146a4ffcba4b8b241b91a9
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/func.sgml | 15 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
doc: Fix whitespace in markup
Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/d10475a0433291bfd136df6edb06497af0f52cb8
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/func.sgml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
doc: Update a confusing sentence about SQL/JSON
Author: Liudmila Mantrova
Reported-by: Jeff Janes
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMkU%3D1wP-SO4KpiLxHJuPezTJCmK%3DJqefLXrr3eXFO7Qku%2BtMg%40mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/p
doc: Update a confusing sentence about SQL/JSON
Author: Liudmila Mantrova
Reported-by: Jeff Janes
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMkU%3D1wP-SO4KpiLxHJuPezTJCmK%3DJqefLXrr3eXFO7Qku%2BtMg%40mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresq
doc: Update note about source code formatting
Update the note about why not to use // comments, even though it's now
technically supported.
The note about variable declarations was dropped here because it's
addressed more properly later in the chapter.
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/mes
doc: Update note about source code formatting
Update the note about why not to use // comments, even though it's now
technically supported.
The note about variable declarations was dropped here because it's
addressed more properly later in the chapter.
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/mes
doc: Reorder JSON functions documentation
Put the description of the SQL/JSON path language after the
description of the general JSON functions and operators, instead of
before.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16968.1569189...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
master
Details
---
doc: Reorder JSON functions documentation
Put the description of the SQL/JSON path language after the
description of the general JSON functions and operators, instead of
before.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16968.1569189...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE
Details
23 matches
Mail list logo