Add GUC checks for ssl_min_protocol_version and ssl_max_protocol_version
Mixing incorrect bounds set in the SSL context leads to confusing error
messages generated by OpenSSL which are hard to act on. New checks are
added within the GUC machinery to improve the user experience as they
apply to an
Add GUC checks for ssl_min_protocol_version and ssl_max_protocol_version
Mixing incorrect bounds set in the SSL context leads to confusing error
messages generated by OpenSSL which are hard to act on. New checks are
added within the GUC machinery to improve the user experience as they
apply to an
Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> On Jan 17, 2020, at 12:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Shoulda been a catversion bump in here, if only for protocol's sake.
> I'd love to have a git pre-commit hook that would warn about this, it
> seems to happen several times a year, and I know I've transgressed
> more tha
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:50 PM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 17, 2020, at 12:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Dunstan writes:
> >> Add a non-strict version of jsonb_set
> >
> > Shoulda been a catversion bump in here, if only for protocol's sake.
> >
> > (A useful rule of thum
Avoid full scan of GIN indexes when possible
The strategy of GIN index scan is driven by opclass-specific extract_query
method. This method that needed search mode is GIN_SEARCH_MODE_ALL. This
mode means that matching tuple may contain none of extracted entries. Simple
example is '!term' tsquer
Repair more failures with SubPlans in multi-row VALUES lists.
Commit 9b63c13f0 turns out to have been fundamentally misguided:
the parent node's subPlan list is by no means the only way in which
a child SubPlan node can be hooked into the outer execution state.
As shown in bug #16213 from Matt Jib
Repair more failures with SubPlans in multi-row VALUES lists.
Commit 9b63c13f0 turns out to have been fundamentally misguided:
the parent node's subPlan list is by no means the only way in which
a child SubPlan node can be hooked into the outer execution state.
As shown in bug #16213 from Matt Jib
Repair more failures with SubPlans in multi-row VALUES lists.
Commit 9b63c13f0 turns out to have been fundamentally misguided:
the parent node's subPlan list is by no means the only way in which
a child SubPlan node can be hooked into the outer execution state.
As shown in bug #16213 from Matt Jib
Repair more failures with SubPlans in multi-row VALUES lists.
Commit 9b63c13f0 turns out to have been fundamentally misguided:
the parent node's subPlan list is by no means the only way in which
a child SubPlan node can be hooked into the outer execution state.
As shown in bug #16213 from Matt Jib
Repair more failures with SubPlans in multi-row VALUES lists.
Commit 9b63c13f0 turns out to have been fundamentally misguided:
the parent node's subPlan list is by no means the only way in which
a child SubPlan node can be hooked into the outer execution state.
As shown in bug #16213 from Matt Jib
Repair more failures with SubPlans in multi-row VALUES lists.
Commit 9b63c13f0 turns out to have been fundamentally misguided:
the parent node's subPlan list is by no means the only way in which
a child SubPlan node can be hooked into the outer execution state.
As shown in bug #16213 from Matt Jib
Repair more failures with SubPlans in multi-row VALUES lists.
Commit 9b63c13f0 turns out to have been fundamentally misguided:
the parent node's subPlan list is by no means the only way in which
a child SubPlan node can be hooked into the outer execution state.
As shown in bug #16213 from Matt Jib
Set ReorderBufferTXN->final_lsn more eagerly
... specifically, set it incrementally as each individual change is
spilled down to disk. This way, it is set correctly when the
transaction disappears without trace, ie. without leaving an XACT_ABORT
wal record. (This happens when the server crashes
Set ReorderBufferTXN->final_lsn more eagerly
... specifically, set it incrementally as each individual change is
spilled down to disk. This way, it is set correctly when the
transaction disappears without trace, ie. without leaving an XACT_ABORT
wal record. (This happens when the server crashes
Set ReorderBufferTXN->final_lsn more eagerly
... specifically, set it incrementally as each individual change is
spilled down to disk. This way, it is set correctly when the
transaction disappears without trace, ie. without leaving an XACT_ABORT
wal record. (This happens when the server crashes
Set ReorderBufferTXN->final_lsn more eagerly
... specifically, set it incrementally as each individual change is
spilled down to disk. This way, it is set correctly when the
transaction disappears without trace, ie. without leaving an XACT_ABORT
wal record. (This happens when the server crashes
Set ReorderBufferTXN->final_lsn more eagerly
... specifically, set it incrementally as each individual change is
spilled down to disk. This way, it is set correctly when the
transaction disappears without trace, ie. without leaving an XACT_ABORT
wal record. (This happens when the server crashes
Set ReorderBufferTXN->final_lsn more eagerly
... specifically, set it incrementally as each individual change is
spilled down to disk. This way, it is set correctly when the
transaction disappears without trace, ie. without leaving an XACT_ABORT
wal record. (This happens when the server crashes
Set ReorderBufferTXN->final_lsn more eagerly
... specifically, set it incrementally as each individual change is
spilled down to disk. This way, it is set correctly when the
transaction disappears without trace, ie. without leaving an XACT_ABORT
wal record. (This happens when the server crashes
Allocate freechunks bitmap as part of SlabContext
The bitmap used by SlabCheck to cross-check free chunks in a block used
to be allocated for each SlabCheck call, and was never freed. The memory
leak could be fixed by simply adding a pfree call, but it's actually a
bad idea to do any allocations i
Allocate freechunks bitmap as part of SlabContext
The bitmap used by SlabCheck to cross-check free chunks in a block used
to be allocated for each SlabCheck call, and was never freed. The memory
leak could be fixed by simply adding a pfree call, but it's actually a
bad idea to do any allocations i
Allocate freechunks bitmap as part of SlabContext
The bitmap used by SlabCheck to cross-check free chunks in a block used
to be allocated for each SlabCheck call, and was never freed. The memory
leak could be fixed by simply adding a pfree call, but it's actually a
bad idea to do any allocations i
Allocate freechunks bitmap as part of SlabContext
The bitmap used by SlabCheck to cross-check free chunks in a block used
to be allocated for each SlabCheck call, and was never freed. The memory
leak could be fixed by simply adding a pfree call, but it's actually a
bad idea to do any allocations i
23 matches
Mail list logo
