On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 06:11:06PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2020/02/12 7:53, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
>> In my humble opinion, I prefer the previous behavior, streaming without
>> temporary slot, for one reason: primary availability.
>
> +1
>
>> With temp slot created by default, i
Doc: Restructure B-Tree support routine docs.
Use a top-level "variablelist", with one item per B-Tree support
function. This structure matches the structure used by various
"Extensibility" sections in other documentation chapters for other index
access methods.
An explicit list makes it much cl
Remove long-dead comments.
These should've been dropped by a8bb8eb58, but evidently were
missed. Not important enough to back-patch.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0973f5602c349ad99fae6f57cdcc26754a03ba83
Modified Files
--
src/backend/
Doc: fix old oversights in GRANT/REVOKE documentation.
The GRANTED BY clause in GRANT/REVOKE ROLE has been there since 2005
but was never documented. I'm not sure now whether that was just an
oversight or was intentional (given the limited capability of the
option). But seeing that pg_dumpall do
Doc: fix old oversights in GRANT/REVOKE documentation.
The GRANTED BY clause in GRANT/REVOKE ROLE has been there since 2005
but was never documented. I'm not sure now whether that was just an
oversight or was intentional (given the limited capability of the
option). But seeing that pg_dumpall do
Doc: fix old oversights in GRANT/REVOKE documentation.
The GRANTED BY clause in GRANT/REVOKE ROLE has been there since 2005
but was never documented. I'm not sure now whether that was just an
oversight or was intentional (given the limited capability of the
option). But seeing that pg_dumpall do
Doc: fix old oversights in GRANT/REVOKE documentation.
The GRANTED BY clause in GRANT/REVOKE ROLE has been there since 2005
but was never documented. I'm not sure now whether that was just an
oversight or was intentional (given the limited capability of the
option). But seeing that pg_dumpall do
Doc: fix old oversights in GRANT/REVOKE documentation.
The GRANTED BY clause in GRANT/REVOKE ROLE has been there since 2005
but was never documented. I'm not sure now whether that was just an
oversight or was intentional (given the limited capability of the
option). But seeing that pg_dumpall do
Doc: fix old oversights in GRANT/REVOKE documentation.
The GRANTED BY clause in GRANT/REVOKE ROLE has been there since 2005
but was never documented. I'm not sure now whether that was just an
oversight or was intentional (given the limited capability of the
option). But seeing that pg_dumpall do
On 2020/02/12 7:53, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:37:53 +0100
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 2020-01-23 21:49, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 8:57 AM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
walreceiver uses a temporary replication slot by default
If no perman
10 matches
Mail list logo
