Restore robustness of TAP tests that wait for postmaster restart.
Several TAP tests use poll_query_until() to wait for the postmaster
to restart. They were checking to see if a trivial query
(e.g. "SELECT 1") succeeds. However, that's problematic in the wake
of commit 11e9caff8, because now that
Restore robustness of TAP tests that wait for postmaster restart.
Several TAP tests use poll_query_until() to wait for the postmaster
to restart. They were checking to see if a trivial query
(e.g. "SELECT 1") succeeds. However, that's problematic in the wake
of commit 11e9caff8, because now that
Restore robustness of TAP tests that wait for postmaster restart.
Several TAP tests use poll_query_until() to wait for the postmaster
to restart. They were checking to see if a trivial query
(e.g. "SELECT 1") succeeds. However, that's problematic in the wake
of commit 11e9caff8, because now that
Restore robustness of TAP tests that wait for postmaster restart.
Several TAP tests use poll_query_until() to wait for the postmaster
to restart. They were checking to see if a trivial query
(e.g. "SELECT 1") succeeds. However, that's problematic in the wake
of commit 11e9caff8, because now that
Restore robustness of TAP tests that wait for postmaster restart.
Several TAP tests use poll_query_until() to wait for the postmaster
to restart. They were checking to see if a trivial query
(e.g. "SELECT 1") succeeds. However, that's problematic in the wake
of commit 11e9caff8, because now that
Ensure pg_filenode_relation(0, 0) returns NULL.
Previously, a zero value for the relfilenode resulted in
a confusing error message about "unexpected duplicate".
This function returns NULL for other invalid relfilenode
values, so zero should be treated likewise.
It's been like this all along, so b
Ensure pg_filenode_relation(0, 0) returns NULL.
Previously, a zero value for the relfilenode resulted in
a confusing error message about "unexpected duplicate".
This function returns NULL for other invalid relfilenode
values, so zero should be treated likewise.
It's been like this all along, so b
Ensure pg_filenode_relation(0, 0) returns NULL.
Previously, a zero value for the relfilenode resulted in
a confusing error message about "unexpected duplicate".
This function returns NULL for other invalid relfilenode
values, so zero should be treated likewise.
It's been like this all along, so b
Ensure pg_filenode_relation(0, 0) returns NULL.
Previously, a zero value for the relfilenode resulted in
a confusing error message about "unexpected duplicate".
This function returns NULL for other invalid relfilenode
values, so zero should be treated likewise.
It's been like this all along, so b
Ensure pg_filenode_relation(0, 0) returns NULL.
Previously, a zero value for the relfilenode resulted in
a confusing error message about "unexpected duplicate".
This function returns NULL for other invalid relfilenode
values, so zero should be treated likewise.
It's been like this all along, so b
Ensure pg_filenode_relation(0, 0) returns NULL.
Previously, a zero value for the relfilenode resulted in
a confusing error message about "unexpected duplicate".
This function returns NULL for other invalid relfilenode
values, so zero should be treated likewise.
It's been like this all along, so b
Don't use Asserts to check for violations of replication protocol.
Using an Assert to check the validity of incoming messages is an
extremely poor decision. In a debug build, it should not be that easy
for a broken or malicious remote client to crash the logrep worker.
The consequences could be e
Don't use Asserts to check for violations of replication protocol.
Using an Assert to check the validity of incoming messages is an
extremely poor decision. In a debug build, it should not be that easy
for a broken or malicious remote client to crash the logrep worker.
The consequences could be e
Don't use Asserts to check for violations of replication protocol.
Using an Assert to check the validity of incoming messages is an
extremely poor decision. In a debug build, it should not be that easy
for a broken or malicious remote client to crash the logrep worker.
The consequences could be e
Don't use Asserts to check for violations of replication protocol.
Using an Assert to check the validity of incoming messages is an
extremely poor decision. In a debug build, it should not be that easy
for a broken or malicious remote client to crash the logrep worker.
The consequences could be e
Don't use Asserts to check for violations of replication protocol.
Using an Assert to check the validity of incoming messages is an
extremely poor decision. In a debug build, it should not be that easy
for a broken or malicious remote client to crash the logrep worker.
The consequences could be e
Fix new recovery test for use under msys
Commit caba8f0d43 wasn't quite right for msys, as demonstrated by
several buildfarm animals, including jacana and fairywren. We need to
use the msys perl in the archive command, but call it in such a way that
Windows will understand the path. Furthermore, i
Fix new recovery test for use under msys
Commit caba8f0d43 wasn't quite right for msys, as demonstrated by
several buildfarm animals, including jacana and fairywren. We need to
use the msys perl in the archive command, but call it in such a way that
Windows will understand the path. Furthermore, i
Fix new recovery test for use under msys
Commit caba8f0d43 wasn't quite right for msys, as demonstrated by
several buildfarm animals, including jacana and fairywren. We need to
use the msys perl in the archive command, but call it in such a way that
Windows will understand the path. Furthermore, i
Fix new recovery test for use under msys
Commit caba8f0d43 wasn't quite right for msys, as demonstrated by
several buildfarm animals, including jacana and fairywren. We need to
use the msys perl in the archive command, but call it in such a way that
Windows will understand the path. Furthermore, i
Fix new recovery test for use under msys
Commit caba8f0d43 wasn't quite right for msys, as demonstrated by
several buildfarm animals, including jacana and fairywren. We need to
use the msys perl in the archive command, but call it in such a way that
Windows will understand the path. Furthermore, i
Fix new recovery test for use under msys
Commit caba8f0d43 wasn't quite right for msys, as demonstrated by
several buildfarm animals, including jacana and fairywren. We need to
use the msys perl in the archive command, but call it in such a way that
Windows will understand the path. Furthermore, i
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 5:14 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
> Make archiver process an auxiliary process.
>
> This commit changes WAL archiver process so that it's treated as
> an auxiliary process and can use shared memory. This is an infrastructure
> patch required for upcoming shared-memory based stats
Simplify some code in getObjectTypeDescription()
This routine is designed to never return an empty description or NULL,
providing description fallbacks even if missing objects are accepted,
but it included a code path where this was considered possible. All the
callers of this routine already con
24 matches
Mail list logo
