Add missing ObjectIdGetDatum() in syscache lookup calls for Oids
Based on how postgres.h foes the Oid <-> Datum conversion, there is no
existing bugs but let's be consistent. 17 spots have been noticed as
incorrectly passing down Oids rather than Datums. Aleksander got one,
Zhang two and I the r
Fix pg_recvlogical upon signal termination
When pg_recvlogical needs to abort on a signal like SIGINT/SIGTERM, it
is expected to exit cleanly as the code documents. However, the code
forgot to clean up the state of the connection before leaving. This
would cause the tool to emit messages like "u
Doc: move unparenthesized syntaxes for a few commands.
Move documentation of the unparenthesized syntaxes for VACUUM,
ANALYZE, EXPLAIN, and CLUSTER to the "Compatibility" section of
their documentation to improve readability of the preferred,
parenthesized syntaxes.
Author: Melanie Plageman
Discu
Rearrange CLUSTER rules in gram.y.
This change moves the unparenthesized syntax for CLUSTER to the end
of the ClusterStmt rules in preparation for a follow-up commit that
will move this syntax to the "Compatibility" section of the CLUSTER
documentation. The documentation for the CLUSTER syntaxes
Support parenthesized syntax for CLUSTER without a table name.
b5913f6120 added a parenthesized syntax for CLUSTER, but it
requires specifying a table name. This is unlike commands such as
VACUUM and ANALYZE, which do not require specifying a table in the
parenthesized syntax. This change resolv
Add psql \drg command to display role grants.
With the addition of INHERIT and SET options for role grants,
the historical display of role memberships in \du/\dg is woefully
inadequate. Besides those options, there are pre-existing
shortcomings that you can't see the ADMIN option nor the grantor.
Add psql \drg command to display role grants.
With the addition of INHERIT and SET options for role grants,
the historical display of role memberships in \du/\dg is woefully
inadequate. Besides those options, there are pre-existing
shortcomings that you can't see the ADMIN option nor the grantor.
Doc: improve description of IN and row-constructor comparisons.
IN and NOT IN work fine on records and arrays, so just say that
they accept "expressions" not "scalar expressions". I think that
that phrasing was meant to say that they don't work on set-returning
expressions, but that's not the com
Doc: improve description of IN and row-constructor comparisons.
IN and NOT IN work fine on records and arrays, so just say that
they accept "expressions" not "scalar expressions". I think that
that phrasing was meant to say that they don't work on set-returning
expressions, but that's not the com
Doc: improve description of IN and row-constructor comparisons.
IN and NOT IN work fine on records and arrays, so just say that
they accept "expressions" not "scalar expressions". I think that
that phrasing was meant to say that they don't work on set-returning
expressions, but that's not the com
Doc: improve description of IN and row-constructor comparisons.
IN and NOT IN work fine on records and arrays, so just say that
they accept "expressions" not "scalar expressions". I think that
that phrasing was meant to say that they don't work on set-returning
expressions, but that's not the com
Doc: improve description of IN and row-constructor comparisons.
IN and NOT IN work fine on records and arrays, so just say that
they accept "expressions" not "scalar expressions". I think that
that phrasing was meant to say that they don't work on set-returning
expressions, but that's not the com
Doc: improve description of IN and row-constructor comparisons.
IN and NOT IN work fine on records and arrays, so just say that
they accept "expressions" not "scalar expressions". I think that
that phrasing was meant to say that they don't work on set-returning
expressions, but that's not the com
Doc: improve description of IN and row-constructor comparisons.
IN and NOT IN work fine on records and arrays, so just say that
they accept "expressions" not "scalar expressions". I think that
that phrasing was meant to say that they don't work on set-returning
expressions, but that's not the com
14 matches
Mail list logo
