Stamp 13.22.
Branch
--
REL_13_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/af2dbe860b638dbd45604270d103e0a59dc0a372
Modified Files
--
configure| 18 +-
configure.in | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Stamp 14.19.
Branch
--
REL_14_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4e9da016ade3e75400f6fdc22ed1fed7fdd32f7a
Modified Files
--
configure| 18 +-
configure.ac | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Stamp 15.14.
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0ab43b548237b3791261480d6a023f6b95b53942
Modified Files
--
configure| 18 +-
configure.ac | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Stamp 16.10.
Branch
--
REL_16_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c13dd7d50f21268dc64b4b3edbce31993985ab12
Modified Files
--
configure| 18 +-
configure.ac | 2 +-
meson.build | 2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(
Stamp 17.6.
Branch
--
REL_17_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7885b94dd81b98bbab9ed878680d156df7bf857f
Modified Files
--
configure| 18 +-
configure.ac | 2 +-
meson.build | 2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-
Stamp 18beta3.
Branch
--
REL_18_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/ab844ce378fe81d15cf000f821af663af3846ab6
Modified Files
--
configure| 18 +-
configure.ac | 2 +-
meson.build | 2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletion
Release notes for 17.6, 16.10, 15.14, 14.19, 13.22.
Branch
--
REL_16_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/94c067376d5395fff7bf3e7980d11fcd2482b2be
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/release-16.sgml | 1434 ++
1 file ch
Release notes for 17.6, 16.10, 15.14, 14.19, 13.22.
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/dfe189ecdf8709b332439ae72693d10b2640234b
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/release-15.sgml | 1336 ++
1 file ch
Release notes for 17.6, 16.10, 15.14, 14.19, 13.22.
Branch
--
REL_14_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/e21c9823d387a31d9efe452fff60a88f3c4a7e19
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/release-14.sgml | 1209 ++
1 file ch
Release notes for 17.6, 16.10, 15.14, 14.19, 13.22.
Branch
--
REL_13_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7ee1a7f89b65815001ce4a97570726ebbc988283
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/release-13.sgml | 1135 ++
1 file ch
Release notes for 17.6, 16.10, 15.14, 14.19, 13.22.
Branch
--
REL_17_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/024123a0d38e3f3fdcbab411eb01cba4b36adc86
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/release-17.sgml | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
Mop-up for Datum conversion cleanups.
Fix a couple more places where an explicit Datum conversion
is needed (not clear how we missed these in ff89e182d and
previous commits).
Replace the minority usage "(Datum) NULL" with "(Datum) 0".
The former depends on the assumption that Datum is the same
wi
First-draft release notes for 17.6.
As usual, the release notes for other branches will be made by cutting
these down, but put them up for community review first.
Branch
--
REL_17_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/b70d9de77f337828ca3a0a3064a6827b1ce68977
Modifi
be advisable to keep the "clean" target doing its thing.
But I agree with disabling 'all', 'check', 'installcheck'.
regards, tom lane
to
short-circuit building the test program. I think the issue is that
we apply that short-circuit at the next makefile level up --- can
we do it in src/interfaces/libpq-oauth/Makefile itself?
regards, tom lane
g to build it
anyway.
regards, tom lane
y: alexander.kj...@hafslund.no
Author: Euler Taveira
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175456294638.800.12038559679827947...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/04b7ff3cd33c0b9574eed3b662
y: alexander.kj...@hafslund.no
Author: Euler Taveira
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175456294638.800.12038559679827947...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_14_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/fe966e886ce844fda218
y: alexander.kj...@hafslund.no
Author: Euler Taveira
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175456294638.800.12038559679827947...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/186bc0dfdcb0d4376ffe
y: alexander.kj...@hafslund.no
Author: Euler Taveira
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175456294638.800.12038559679827947...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_17_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/13244ba1032573bf1a22
y: alexander.kj...@hafslund.no
Author: Euler Taveira
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175456294638.800.12038559679827947...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_18_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/31c09ef4563612467b31
y: alexander.kj...@hafslund.no
Author: Euler Taveira
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175456294638.800.12038559679827947...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_16_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/3a3b1d7ab1809910e51c
y: alexander.kj...@hafslund.no
Author: Euler Taveira
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175456294638.800.12038559679827947...@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_13_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/f9b09fe63cbc88319de7
of field complaints. However, users with BRIN indexes that use the
numeric_minmax_multi_ops opclass may wish to reindex in hopes of
making their indexes more efficient.
Author: Peter Eisentraut
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2093712.1753983...@sss.pgh.pa.us
of field complaints. However, users with BRIN indexes that use the
numeric_minmax_multi_ops opclass may wish to reindex in hopes of
making their indexes more efficient.
Author: Peter Eisentraut
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2093712.1753983...@sss.pgh.pa.us
of field complaints. However, users with BRIN indexes that use the
numeric_minmax_multi_ops opclass may wish to reindex in hopes of
making their indexes more efficient.
Author: Peter Eisentraut
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2093712.1753983...@sss.pgh.pa.us
of field complaints. However, users with BRIN indexes that use the
numeric_minmax_multi_ops opclass may wish to reindex in hopes of
making their indexes more efficient.
Author: Peter Eisentraut
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2093712.1753983...@sss.pgh.pa.us
of field complaints. However, users with BRIN indexes that use the
numeric_minmax_multi_ops opclass may wish to reindex in hopes of
making their indexes more efficient.
Author: Peter Eisentraut
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2093712.1753983...@sss.pgh.pa.us
of field complaints. However, users with BRIN indexes that use the
numeric_minmax_multi_ops opclass may wish to reindex in hopes of
making their indexes more efficient.
Author: Peter Eisentraut
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2093712.1753983...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Mop-up for commit e035863c9.
Neither Peter nor I had tried this with USE_VALGRIND ...
Per buildfarm member skink.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/f291751ef86ec407b3e67a951f55e79fb160ae10
Modified Files
--
src/backend/access/common/print
Take a little more care in set_backtrace().
Coverity complained that the "errtrace" string is leaked if we return
early because backtrace_symbols fails. Another criticism that could
be leveled at this is that not providing any hint of what happened is
user-unfriendly. Fix that.
The odds of a le
s socket-files and
lock-files lists being leaked, which we can silence by just
not nulling out the static pointers to them.
* Valgrind seems not to consider the global "environ" variable as
a valid root pointer; so when we allocate a new environment array,
it claims that data is leaked.
27;t provoking Valgrind complaints. (Perhaps in a
CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS build, they would?) For the moment, this
makes the src/pl/plpgsql tests leak-free according to Valgrind.
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
ing
to fix this completely. However, I did grab some low-hanging fruit:
several places were leaking the result of get_tsearch_config_filename.
This seems worth doing mostly because they are inconsistent with other
dictionaries that were freeing it already.
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: And
hich do say "0 bytes lost".
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4fbfdde58e4cd091f88737dffa241b08c23d8829
Modified Files
--
src/backend/
r
that code out into a helper function. define_custom_variable's logic
was one brick shy of a load too: it forgot to free the separate
allocation for the placeholder's name.
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://pos
nstead of rolling its own implementation, which was equally broken
according to Valgrind.
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/9e9190154ef204a4e814dcc99f76339
elpful to start with the comments
added at the head of mcxt.c.
Author: Andres Freund
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20210317181531.7oggpqevzz6bk...@alap3.anarazel.de
Branch
-
e far from the only leaks in PL/pgSQL compilation, but
they're the biggest as far as I've seen, and further improvement
looks like it'd require delicate and bug-prone surgery.
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756...@sss.pgh.pa
cases because we're unsure if any
fn_extra pointers remain. That might be nice to do something about
eventually, but it's not clear how.
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
master
Details
---
to someone else to investigate that.
Reported-by: Charles Samborski
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/70f2155f-27ca-4534-b33d-7750e2063...@demurgos.net
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_18_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/8e5e3ff5564104b5e1c3c
to someone else to investigate that.
Reported-by: Charles Samborski
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/70f2155f-27ca-4534-b33d-7750e2063...@demurgos.net
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_16_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/bbc20c8a9ffdefcabd70e
to someone else to investigate that.
Reported-by: Charles Samborski
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/70f2155f-27ca-4534-b33d-7750e2063...@demurgos.net
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/19857437b07353908c7da
to someone else to investigate that.
Reported-by: Charles Samborski
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/70f2155f-27ca-4534-b33d-7750e2063...@demurgos.net
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_13_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c5bd803e58162e39e3dcd
to someone else to investigate that.
Reported-by: Charles Samborski
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/70f2155f-27ca-4534-b33d-7750e2063...@demurgos.net
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_17_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a644f5fc66a36ff7c630b
to someone else to investigate that.
Reported-by: Charles Samborski
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/70f2155f-27ca-4534-b33d-7750e2063...@demurgos.net
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4300d8b6a79d61abb5ca9
to someone else to investigate that.
Reported-by: Charles Samborski
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/70f2155f-27ca-4534-b33d-7750e2063...@demurgos.net
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_14_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/2dee95bd0cf18d99e4d47
ssentially
completes reverting all the non-cosmetic changes in 6082b3d5d.)
Reported-by: Jim Jones
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/997668.1753802...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_13_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
ssentially
completes reverting all the non-cosmetic changes in 6082b3d5d.)
Reported-by: Jim Jones
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/997668.1753802...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_17_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
ssentially
completes reverting all the non-cosmetic changes in 6082b3d5d.)
Reported-by: Jim Jones
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/997668.1753802...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_18_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
ssentially
completes reverting all the non-cosmetic changes in 6082b3d5d.)
Reported-by: Jim Jones
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/997668.1753802...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_16_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
ssentially
completes reverting all the non-cosmetic changes in 6082b3d5d.)
Reported-by: Jim Jones
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/997668.1753802...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
ssentially
completes reverting all the non-cosmetic changes in 6082b3d5d.)
Reported-by: Jim Jones
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/997668.1753802...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
ssentially
completes reverting all the non-cosmetic changes in 6082b3d5d.)
Reported-by: Jim Jones
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/997668.1753802...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_14_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
atching any harder than it was already.
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/420221.1753714...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/74e121c8dc5184318478dee587cf7d8303ab1357
Modified Files
--
contrib/po
at
the previous presence of a setjmp() in the function stopped
them from attempting any flow analysis at all. Add a dummy
initialization to silence the warning.
Reported-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/caexhw5tkercufa_f6oct5dmj61n+yvrvgyxl7m8dd-5_zxj...@mail.gm
eported-by: Michael Paquier
Author: Michael Paquier
Co-authored-by: Erik Wienhold
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aigknluc8b8eg...@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/71c0921b649d7a800eb2d6f9353989
eported-by: Michael Paquier
Author: Michael Paquier
Co-authored-by: Erik Wienhold
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aigknluc8b8eg...@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_13_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
eported-by: Michael Paquier
Author: Michael Paquier
Co-authored-by: Erik Wienhold
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aigknluc8b8eg...@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_18_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
eported-by: Michael Paquier
Author: Michael Paquier
Co-authored-by: Erik Wienhold
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aigknluc8b8eg...@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_14_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
eported-by: Michael Paquier
Author: Michael Paquier
Co-authored-by: Erik Wienhold
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aigknluc8b8eg...@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_16_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
eported-by: Michael Paquier
Author: Michael Paquier
Co-authored-by: Erik Wienhold
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aigknluc8b8eg...@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
eported-by: Michael Paquier
Author: Michael Paquier
Co-authored-by: Erik Wienhold
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aigknluc8b8eg...@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_17_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
Add commit 73873805f to .git-blame-ignore-revs.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/db6461b1c9aae122b90bb52430f06efb306b371a
Modified Files
--
.git-blame-ignore-revs | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Run pgindent on the changes of the previous patch.
This step can be checked mechanically.
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Matheus Alcantara
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2976982.1748049...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff
of this mechanism.
A good deal of follow-on simplification is possible now that we don't
have to be so cautious about freeing PGresults, but I'll put that in
a separate patch.
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Matheus Alcantara
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2976982.1748049...@sss.p
did not re-indent code within the removed
PG_TRY constructs. That'll be done in a separate patch.
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Matheus Alcantara
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2976982.1748049...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commi
ch seems like a
pretty negligible cost in a function that runs at most once per
process.
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Matheus Alcantara
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2976982.1748049...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.or
This oversight dates to 7c797e719 which invented the option.
But back-patching doesn't seem appropriate given the lack of
field complaints. If there is anyone running an affected
workload on Windows, they might be unhappy about the behavior
changing in a minor release.
Author: Aidar Imamov
use that same symbol to control whether we include
"const" in the declaration of pam_passwd_conv_proc().
Bug: #18995
Reported-by: Andrew Watkins
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18995-82058da9ab433...@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_13_STA
use that same symbol to control whether we include
"const" in the declaration of pam_passwd_conv_proc().
Bug: #18995
Reported-by: Andrew Watkins
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18995-82058da9ab433...@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_15_STA
use that same symbol to control whether we include
"const" in the declaration of pam_passwd_conv_proc().
Bug: #18995
Reported-by: Andrew Watkins
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18995-82058da9ab433...@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_18_STA
use that same symbol to control whether we include
"const" in the declaration of pam_passwd_conv_proc().
Bug: #18995
Reported-by: Andrew Watkins
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18995-82058da9ab433...@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
master
Detail
use that same symbol to control whether we include
"const" in the declaration of pam_passwd_conv_proc().
Bug: #18995
Reported-by: Andrew Watkins
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18995-82058da9ab433...@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_16_STA
use that same symbol to control whether we include
"const" in the declaration of pam_passwd_conv_proc().
Bug: #18995
Reported-by: Andrew Watkins
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18995-82058da9ab433...@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_17_STA
use that same symbol to control whether we include
"const" in the declaration of pam_passwd_conv_proc().
Bug: #18995
Reported-by: Andrew Watkins
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18995-82058da9ab433...@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_14_STA
s way, especially if we take the
opportunity to add some comments so that readers don't have to
reverse-engineer the usage of these local variables. Also add
some braces for better/more consistent style.
Author: Tender Wang
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAHewX
d byteaout.
Author: Steven Niu
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke
Reviewed-by: Stepan Neretin
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ca315729-140b-426e-81a6-6cd5cfe7e...@gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/3683af617044d271ab7486d43d06f9
nd master do that.
Author: Daniele Varrazzo
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/ca+mi_8yts8wpzpo0pab2aaglwhuq0deqrf0zmnvwss4y9fw...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.po
nd master do that.
Author: Daniele Varrazzo
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/ca+mi_8yts8wpzpo0pab2aaglwhuq0deqrf0zmnvwss4y9fw...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.po
nd master do that.
Author: Daniele Varrazzo
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/ca+mi_8yts8wpzpo0pab2aaglwhuq0deqrf0zmnvwss4y9fw...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_13_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.po
nd master do that.
Author: Daniele Varrazzo
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/ca+mi_8yts8wpzpo0pab2aaglwhuq0deqrf0zmnvwss4y9fw...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_17_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.po
nd master do that.
Author: Daniele Varrazzo
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/ca+mi_8yts8wpzpo0pab2aaglwhuq0deqrf0zmnvwss4y9fw...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_18_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.po
nd master do that.
Author: Daniele Varrazzo
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/ca+mi_8yts8wpzpo0pab2aaglwhuq0deqrf0zmnvwss4y9fw...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_14_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.po
nd master do that.
Author: Daniele Varrazzo
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/ca+mi_8yts8wpzpo0pab2aaglwhuq0deqrf0zmnvwss4y9fw...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Branch
--
REL_16_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.po
David Rowley writes:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 at 15:19, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmph. I doubt we are ready to require C11 everywhere, but maybe
>> we could require it in MSVC builds? Which MSVC versions would
>> that eliminate?
> Going by [1] it's Visual Studio 2019, whi
David Rowley writes:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 at 02:56, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Looking again at the code for ereport_domain(), I wondered if
>> something like this would help MSVC see through it:
> I tried this and it unfortunately doesn't fix the issue.
I didn't have hug
er thinks
is_error_ is a compile-time constant. I'm just guessing
though, don't have this compiler to test with.
regards, tom lane
E".
Back-patch appropriate subsets. I did not risk changing
pg_ident.conf.sample in released branches, but it still seems OK
to change it in v18.
Reported-by: Alexey Shishkin
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175206279327.31575
E".
Back-patch appropriate subsets. I did not risk changing
pg_ident.conf.sample in released branches, but it still seems OK
to change it in v18.
Reported-by: Alexey Shishkin
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175206279327.31575
E".
Back-patch appropriate subsets. I did not risk changing
pg_ident.conf.sample in released branches, but it still seems OK
to change it in v18.
Reported-by: Alexey Shishkin
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175206279327.31575
E".
Back-patch appropriate subsets. I did not risk changing
pg_ident.conf.sample in released branches, but it still seems OK
to change it in v18.
Reported-by: Alexey Shishkin
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175206279327.31575
E".
Back-patch appropriate subsets. I did not risk changing
pg_ident.conf.sample in released branches, but it still seems OK
to change it in v18.
Reported-by: Alexey Shishkin
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175206279327.31575
E".
Back-patch appropriate subsets. I did not risk changing
pg_ident.conf.sample in released branches, but it still seems OK
to change it in v18.
Reported-by: Alexey Shishkin
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175206279327.31575
E".
Back-patch appropriate subsets. I did not risk changing
pg_ident.conf.sample in released branches, but it still seems OK
to change it in v18.
Reported-by: Alexey Shishkin
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/175206279327.31575
etely fails to
explain this, and the Asserts don't cover it either. The comment
is pretty obscure anyway, so rewrite it, and extend the Asserts
to reject WJB_DONE.
This is only cosmetic, so no need for back-patch.
Author: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0c623e8a204187b87b4
n. Let's fix it in a less
magical, more future-proof way by changing JsonbIteratorNext()
so that it always does set val->type. The cost of that should be
pretty negligible, and it makes the function's API spec less squishy.
Reported-by: Erik Rijkers
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Andr
n. Let's fix it in a less
magical, more future-proof way by changing JsonbIteratorNext()
so that it always does set val->type. The cost of that should be
pretty negligible, and it makes the function's API spec less squishy.
Reported-by: Erik Rijkers
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Andr
n. Let's fix it in a less
magical, more future-proof way by changing JsonbIteratorNext()
so that it always does set val->type. The cost of that should be
pretty negligible, and it makes the function's API spec less squishy.
Reported-by: Erik Rijkers
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Andr
n. Let's fix it in a less
magical, more future-proof way by changing JsonbIteratorNext()
so that it always does set val->type. The cost of that should be
pretty negligible, and it makes the function's API spec less squishy.
Reported-by: Erik Rijkers
Author: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Andr
1 - 100 of 8633 matches
Mail list logo