Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On March 31, 2018 8:43:37 AM PDT, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I don't want to waste cycles on testing docs when I'm trying
> >> to test code, any more than I would like the reverse (ie forcing a docs
> >> build to build code too).
>
> > They're a local check
Andres Freund writes:
> On March 31, 2018 8:43:37 AM PDT, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't want to waste cycles on testing docs when I'm trying
>> to test code, any more than I would like the reverse (ie forcing a docs
>> build to build code too).
> They're a local check target in the docs directory.
On March 31, 2018 8:43:37 AM PDT, Tom Lane wrote:
>Peter Eisentraut writes:
>> On 3/29/18 14:43, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I'm *not* OK with expanding the scope of "make check"
>to include building the documentation. It's never had anything to do
>with docs before and I see no reason to start no
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 3/29/18 14:43, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Hm, what's wrong just doing it in the normal build? It's a desired build
>>> artifact, so I really don't see any argument for not building it by
>>> default? Don't quite see what the advantage of doing it during make
>>> check
On 3/29/18 14:43, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Hm, what's wrong just doing it in the normal build? It's a desired build
>> artifact, so I really don't see any argument for not building it by
>> default? Don't quite see what the advantage of doing it during make
>> check would be?
> I meant running som
Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-03-29 15:20:58 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Andres Freund wrote:
> >
> > > Could we add INSTALL to the all target in src/docs/sgml? It's a bit
> > > awkward that one can build the docs and miss such a mistake. It's fast
> > > to build in comparison to th
Hi,
On 2018-03-29 15:20:58 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
>
> > Could we add INSTALL to the all target in src/docs/sgml? It's a bit
> > awkward that one can build the docs and miss such a mistake. It's fast
> > to build in comparison to the rest of the docs, so that doesn't s
Andres Freund wrote:
> Could we add INSTALL to the all target in src/docs/sgml? It's a bit
> awkward that one can build the docs and miss such a mistake. It's fast
> to build in comparison to the rest of the docs, so that doesn't seem
> like a high price?
Maybe it can be tested for in "make check
On 2018-03-29 01:10:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > Add documentation for the JIT feature.
>
> guaibausaurus complains that this broke tarball building:
>
> make -C postgresql-11devel/doc/src/sgml/ INSTALL
> make[1]: Entering directory
> '/home/pgsql/buildfarm/buildroot/HE
Andres Freund writes:
> Add documentation for the JIT feature.
guaibausaurus complains that this broke tarball building:
make -C postgresql-11devel/doc/src/sgml/ INSTALL
make[1]: Entering directory
'/home/pgsql/buildfarm/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/postgresql-11devel/doc/src/sgml'
/usr/bin/xsltp
On 28 March 2018 at 22:23, Andres Freund wrote:
> Add documentation for the JIT feature.
Very nice feature and most welcome but we should call it something
other than just "JIT"
JIT means Just In Time, which could be applied to many concepts and
has been in use for many years in a range of conc
11 matches
Mail list logo
