Re: pgsql: Fix bug #16784 in Disk-based Hash Aggregation.

2020-12-27 Thread Jeff Davis
On Sun, 2020-12-27 at 09:59 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote: > I think I just need to disable sort. Because there is a () group, we > don't need a Sort in the plan to exercise the bug. That still didn't stabilize the test, so I removed the EXPLAIN part of the test and left the execution test in place. Th

Re: pgsql: Fix bug #16784 in Disk-based Hash Aggregation.

2020-12-27 Thread Jeff Davis
On Sun, 2020-12-27 at 02:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Jeff Davis writes: > > Fix bug #16784 in Disk-based Hash Aggregation. > > Buildfarm thinks this new test case is not completely stable. > > It appears that only 32-bit machines are failing, and it's > not totally consistent even for them. Dun

Re: pgsql: Fix bug #16784 in Disk-based Hash Aggregation.

2020-12-26 Thread Tom Lane
Jeff Davis writes: > Fix bug #16784 in Disk-based Hash Aggregation. Buildfarm thinks this new test case is not completely stable. It appears that only 32-bit machines are failing, and it's not totally consistent even for them. Dunno what to make of it. regards, tom lane