On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 05:18:02PM +1030, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I was going to upgrade it when I could migrate the OS of the host machine
> to CentOS 8. However, last time I looked some things about Centos 8 (e.g.
> EPEL) were not mature enough. In any case, to do that requires my physical
> pre
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:14:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I propose the attached, which removes the unnecessary entries
>> and puts full control of the IPv4/IPv6 decision in one place
>> (well, two places). The test will still always connect over IPv4,
>> but at least
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:14:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I propose the attached, which removes the unnecessary entries
> and puts full control of the IPv4/IPv6 decision in one place
> (well, two places). The test will still always connect over IPv4,
> but at least there's now a clear route to c
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:08:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I updated prairiedog and gaur to use OpenSSL 1.0.1e, but we are
> not out of the woods there:
>
> * prairiedog required 6:46 to run the ssl test [1], compared to 3:24
> in its last run with 0.9.8x. Why so much slower?
I have seen the te
I wrote:
> * gaur fell over in the ssl test [2]. I had not asked it to run that
> test before, so this may well be a pre-existing issue not something
> new with the version change. It looks like something in that test
> is assuming that we have IPv6 support, which maybe it shouldn't be,
> even in
I wrote:
> You'll probably see failures from some of my dinosaurs too.
> I've not yet switched them over to using newer OpenSSL,
> but will do so tomorrow or so.
I updated prairiedog and gaur to use OpenSSL 1.0.1e, but we are
not out of the woods there:
* prairiedog required 6:46 to run the ssl t
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 3:50 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 12:06:30AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > As I recall, we'd already decided that nightjar needs to be EOL'd
> > because that version of FreeBSD has nonatomic file rename [1].
>
> Ah, indeed. I forgot this discussion, and
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 12:06:30AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> As I recall, we'd already decided that nightjar needs to be EOL'd
> because that version of FreeBSD has nonatomic file rename [1].
Ah, indeed. I forgot this discussion, and that was not long ago.
> You'll probably see failures from some
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 01:58:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> So the buildfarm is not that bad, I have spotted one failure from
> nightjar:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=nightjar&dt=2020-01-06%2003%3A54%3A10
>
> /pgbuild/root/HEAD/pgsql.build/../pgsql/src/interface
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:53:08AM +, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
> So the buildfarm is not that bad, I have spotted one failure from
> nightjar:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=nightjar&dt=2020-01-06
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:53:08AM +, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
>
> Support is out of scope from all the major vendors for these versions
> (for example RHEL5 uses a version based on 0.9.8, and RHEL6 uses 1.0.1),
> and it created some extra maintenance
11 matches
Mail list logo
