On 12/29/2017 08:04 AM, Raúl Marín Rodríguez wrote:
>
> Probably "0?". Although an int with leading zeros is usually an
> octal number, so window's rational fails me.
>
>
> You are right. From the C99 standard:
>
> The exponent always contains at least two digits, and only as many
>
>
> Probably "0?". Although an int with leading zeros is usually an octal
> number, so window's rational fails me.
You are right. From the C99 standard:
> The exponent always contains at least two digits, and only as many more
> digits as necessary to represent the exponent. If the value is zero
# debug(script=0,command=31): double 8.50705917302346e+037
# doesn't match '(?^:command=31.: double 8.50705917302346e\+37\b)'
# debug(script=0,command=32): double 1e+030
# doesn't match '(?^:command=32.: double 1e\+30\b)'
The difference seems to be a leading zero before the exponent, s
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Add pow(), aka power(), function to pgbench.
>
> Raúl Marín Rodríguez, reviewed by Fabien Coelho and Michael Paquier,
> with a minor fix by me.
>
> Discussion:
> http://postgr.es/m/cam6_um4xia14y9hndqu9kaaotwmhhzxw--q_zaczw9hsrsf...@mail.gmail
Add pow(), aka power(), function to pgbench.
Raúl Marín Rodríguez, reviewed by Fabien Coelho and Michael Paquier,
with a minor fix by me.
Discussion:
http://postgr.es/m/cam6_um4xia14y9hndqu9kaaotwmhhzxw--q_zaczw9hsrsf...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresq
