pgsql: Fix portability issue in tests from commit ce773f230.

2021-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Fix portability issue in tests from commit ce773f230. Modern POSIX seems to require strtod() to accept "-NaN", but there's nothing about NaN in SUSv2, and some of our oldest buildfarm members don't like it. Let's try writing it as -'NaN' instead; that seems to produce the same result, at least on

pgsql: Fix portability issue in tests from commit ce773f230.

2021-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Fix portability issue in tests from commit ce773f230. Modern POSIX seems to require strtod() to accept "-NaN", but there's nothing about NaN in SUSv2, and some of our oldest buildfarm members don't like it. Let's try writing it as -'NaN' instead; that seems to produce the same result, at least on

pgsql: Fix portability issue in tests from commit ce773f230.

2021-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Fix portability issue in tests from commit ce773f230. Modern POSIX seems to require strtod() to accept "-NaN", but there's nothing about NaN in SUSv2, and some of our oldest buildfarm members don't like it. Let's try writing it as -'NaN' instead; that seems to produce the same result, at least on

pgsql: Fix portability issue in tests from commit ce773f230.

2021-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Fix portability issue in tests from commit ce773f230. Modern POSIX seems to require strtod() to accept "-NaN", but there's nothing about NaN in SUSv2, and some of our oldest buildfarm members don't like it. Let's try writing it as -'NaN' instead; that seems to produce the same result, at least on

pgsql: Fix portability issue in tests from commit ce773f230.

2021-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Fix portability issue in tests from commit ce773f230. Modern POSIX seems to require strtod() to accept "-NaN", but there's nothing about NaN in SUSv2, and some of our oldest buildfarm members don't like it. Let's try writing it as -'NaN' instead; that seems to produce the same result, at least on