On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 5:36 AM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 5:24 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alexander Korotkov writes:
> > > This patch also changes the way timestamp to timestamptz cast works.
> > > Previously it did timestamp2tm() then tm2timestamp(). Instead, after
> > >
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 5:24 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov writes:
> > This patch also changes the way timestamp to timestamptz cast works.
> > Previously it did timestamp2tm() then tm2timestamp(). Instead, after
> > timestamp2tm() it calculates timezone offset and applies it to
> > or
Alexander Korotkov writes:
> This patch also changes the way timestamp to timestamptz cast works.
> Previously it did timestamp2tm() then tm2timestamp(). Instead, after
> timestamp2tm() it calculates timezone offset and applies it to
> original timestamp value. I hope this is correct.
I'd wonde
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 4:48 PM Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:41 PM Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
> > So, basically standard requires us to suppress any error happening in
> > filter expression.
>
> Sounds like the standard is dumb, then. :-)
>
> > But as I wrote before suppression o
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:41 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> So, basically standard requires us to suppress any error happening in
> filter expression.
Sounds like the standard is dumb, then. :-)
> But as I wrote before suppression of errors in
> datetime comparison may lead to surprising results.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:56 PM Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 10:30 AM Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
> > So, jsonpath behaves like 100 is not greater than 2020. This
> > looks like plain false. And user can't expect that unless she is
> > familiar with our particular issues.
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 10:30 AM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> So, jsonpath behaves like 100 is not greater than 2020. This
> looks like plain false. And user can't expect that unless she is
> familiar with our particular issues. Now I got opinion that such
> errors shouldn't be suppressed.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 6:58 PM Nikita Glukhov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 2:57 AM Tom Lane
> wrote:
> > * More generally, it's completely unclear why some error conditions
> > are thrown as errors and others just result in returning *have_error.
> > In particular, it seems weird that some
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 2:57 AM Tom Lane
wrote:
Alexander Korotkov writes:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 2:12 AM Tom Lane
wrote:
>> The proximate problem seems to be that compareItems() is insufficiently
>> careful to ensure that both values are non-null before passing them
>> off to datatype-sp
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 2:57 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov writes:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 2:12 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The proximate problem seems to be that compareItems() is insufficiently
> >> careful to ensure that both values are non-null before passing them
> >> off to datat
Alexander Korotkov writes:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 2:12 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>> The proximate problem seems to be that compareItems() is insufficiently
>> careful to ensure that both values are non-null before passing them
>> off to datatype-specific code. The code accidentally fails to crash
>>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 2:12 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov writes:
> > I've noticed buildfarm is unhappy with my commits.
>
> The proximate problem seems to be that compareItems() is insufficiently
> careful to ensure that both values are non-null before passing them
> off to datatype-s
Alexander Korotkov writes:
> I've noticed buildfarm is unhappy with my commits.
The proximate problem seems to be that compareItems() is insufficiently
careful to ensure that both values are non-null before passing them
off to datatype-specific code. The code accidentally fails to crash
on 64-bi
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:05 AM Alexander Korotkov <
a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:52 PM Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
> > Implement jsonpath .datetime() method
>
> I've noticed buildfarm is unhappy with my commits.
>
> 1.
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:52 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> Implement jsonpath .datetime() method
I've noticed buildfarm is unhappy with my commits.
1.
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=lapwing&dt=2019-09-25%2020%3A40%3A11
2.
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show
Implement jsonpath .datetime() method
This commit implements jsonpath .datetime() method as it's specified in
SQL/JSON standard. There are no-argument and single-argument versions of
this method. No-argument version selects first of ISO datetime formats
matching input string. Single-argument ve
16 matches
Mail list logo
