On Sun, Apr 23, 2023, 09:39 Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
> > On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 4:25 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Magnus Hagander writes:
> >>> It would perhaps be a good idea to push a README update to the
> >>> pg_bsd_indent repo that states this?
>
> >> Good point. We could ei
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 4:25 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander writes:
>>> It would perhaps be a good idea to push a README update to the
>>> pg_bsd_indent repo that states this?
>> Good point. We could either do that or just take that repo down.
>> I'm happy to p
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 4:25 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Magnus Hagander writes:
> > The plan of this import is that the standalone git version is "dead",
> > correct? Given we now have a version in-tree that's newer than the one
> > in that repo?
>
> Right.
>
> > It would perhaps be a good idea to pu
Magnus Hagander writes:
> The plan of this import is that the standalone git version is "dead",
> correct? Given we now have a version in-tree that's newer than the one
> in that repo?
Right.
> It would perhaps be a good idea to push a README update to the
> pg_bsd_indent repo that states this?
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 6:22 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Import pg_bsd_indent sources.
>
> This brings in an exact copy of the pg_bsd_indent repo as of
> commit d301442799cea44e5ccb04331afc537764ec77c5 (2020-12-28).
The plan of this import is that the standalone git version is "dead",
correct? Given
Import pg_bsd_indent sources.
This brings in an exact copy of the pg_bsd_indent repo as of
commit d301442799cea44e5ccb04331afc537764ec77c5 (2020-12-28).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
