On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 11:09 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> The SpinLockSemaArray field should be completely completely, nut just
> the #ifndef guard around it.
Looks like I had that right in the first version, but got confused
while rebasing over a conflict. Fixed, thanks!
On 30/07/2024 14:03, Thomas Munro wrote:
Remove --disable-spinlocks.
Sorry, spotted this only now:
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/launch_backend.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/launch_backend.c
@@ -108,9 +108,7 @@ typedef struct
#ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS
struct InjectionPointsCtl *ActiveI
Remove --disable-spinlocks.
A later change will require atomic support, so it wouldn't make sense
for a hypothetical new system not to be able to implement spinlocks.
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane (concept, not the patch)
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund (concept, not the pat
