On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 05:18:02PM +1030, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I was going to upgrade it when I could migrate the OS of the host machine
> to CentOS 8. However, last time I looked some things about Centos 8 (e.g.
> EPEL) were not mature enough. In any case, to do that requires my physical
> pre
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:14:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I propose the attached, which removes the unnecessary entries
>> and puts full control of the IPv4/IPv6 decision in one place
>> (well, two places). The test will still always connect over IPv4,
>> but at least
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:14:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I propose the attached, which removes the unnecessary entries
> and puts full control of the IPv4/IPv6 decision in one place
> (well, two places). The test will still always connect over IPv4,
> but at least there's now a clear route to c
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:08:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I updated prairiedog and gaur to use OpenSSL 1.0.1e, but we are
> not out of the woods there:
>
> * prairiedog required 6:46 to run the ssl test [1], compared to 3:24
> in its last run with 0.9.8x. Why so much slower?
I have seen the te
I wrote:
> * gaur fell over in the ssl test [2]. I had not asked it to run that
> test before, so this may well be a pre-existing issue not something
> new with the version change. It looks like something in that test
> is assuming that we have IPv6 support, which maybe it shouldn't be,
> even in
I wrote:
> You'll probably see failures from some of my dinosaurs too.
> I've not yet switched them over to using newer OpenSSL,
> but will do so tomorrow or so.
I updated prairiedog and gaur to use OpenSSL 1.0.1e, but we are
not out of the woods there:
* prairiedog required 6:46 to run the ssl t
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 3:50 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 12:06:30AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > As I recall, we'd already decided that nightjar needs to be EOL'd
> > because that version of FreeBSD has nonatomic file rename [1].
>
> Ah, indeed. I forgot this discussion, and
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 12:06:30AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> As I recall, we'd already decided that nightjar needs to be EOL'd
> because that version of FreeBSD has nonatomic file rename [1].
Ah, indeed. I forgot this discussion, and that was not long ago.
> You'll probably see failures from some
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 01:58:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> So the buildfarm is not that bad, I have spotted one failure from
> nightjar:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=nightjar&dt=2020-01-06%2003%3A54%3A10
>
> /pgbuild/root/HEAD/pgsql.build/../pgsql/src/interface
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:53:08AM +, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
> So the buildfarm is not that bad, I have spotted one failure from
> nightjar:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=nightjar&dt=2020-01-06
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:53:08AM +, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
>
> Support is out of scope from all the major vendors for these versions
> (for example RHEL5 uses a version based on 0.9.8, and RHEL6 uses 1.0.1),
> and it created some extra maintenance
Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
Support is out of scope from all the major vendors for these versions
(for example RHEL5 uses a version based on 0.9.8, and RHEL6 uses 1.0.1),
and it created some extra maintenance work. Upstream has stopped
support of 0.9.8 in December 2015 and of 1.0.0
12 matches
Mail list logo
