Re: pgsql: Restore erroneously removed ONLY from PK check

2018-04-04 Thread Tom Lane
Andres Freund writes: > Shouldn't the difference due to the ONLY be visible in cases with > inheritance? As in, spuriously succeeding or such? Seems like > something that a normal regression test would be good for? Yeah, if it actually matters (which I think it does), it shouldn't be hard to de

Re: pgsql: Restore erroneously removed ONLY from PK check

2018-04-04 Thread Andres Freund
On 2018-04-04 19:38:57 +, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Restore erroneously removed ONLY from PK check > > This is a blind fix, since I don't have SE-Linux to verify it. > > Per unwanted change in rhinoceros, running sepgsql tests. Noted by Tom > Lane. > > Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/32347.15

pgsql: Restore erroneously removed ONLY from PK check

2018-04-04 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Restore erroneously removed ONLY from PK check This is a blind fix, since I don't have SE-Linux to verify it. Per unwanted change in rhinoceros, running sepgsql tests. Noted by Tom Lane. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/32347.1522865...@sss.pgh.pa.us Branch -- master Details --- https: