Improve comment in get_partition_dispatch_recurse.
David Rowley, reviewed by Amit Langote, and revised a bit by me.
Discussion:
http://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9yyimYyFzbHM4EwE+tkj4jvrHqSH0H4S4Kbas=ufp...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
Pass the correct PlannerInfo to PlanForeignModify/PlanDirectModify.
Previously, we passed the toplevel PlannerInfo, but we actually want
to pass the relevant subroot. One problem with passing the toplevel
PlannerInfo is that the FDW which wants to push down an UPDATE or
DELETE against a join
Fix misprocessing of equivalence classes involving record_eq().
canonicalize_ec_expression() is supposed to agree with coerce_type() as to
whether a RelabelType should be inserted to make a subexpression be valid
input for the operators of a given opclass. However, it did the wrong
thing with
Fix misprocessing of equivalence classes involving record_eq().
canonicalize_ec_expression() is supposed to agree with coerce_type() as to
whether a RelabelType should be inserted to make a subexpression be valid
input for the operators of a given opclass. However, it did the wrong
thing with
Fix misprocessing of equivalence classes involving record_eq().
canonicalize_ec_expression() is supposed to agree with coerce_type() as to
whether a RelabelType should be inserted to make a subexpression be valid
input for the operators of a given opclass. However, it did the wrong
thing with
Fix misprocessing of equivalence classes involving record_eq().
canonicalize_ec_expression() is supposed to agree with coerce_type() as to
whether a RelabelType should be inserted to make a subexpression be valid
input for the operators of a given opclass. However, it did the wrong
thing with
Fix misprocessing of equivalence classes involving record_eq().
canonicalize_ec_expression() is supposed to agree with coerce_type() as to
whether a RelabelType should be inserted to make a subexpression be valid
input for the operators of a given opclass. However, it did the wrong
thing with
Fix misprocessing of equivalence classes involving record_eq().
canonicalize_ec_expression() is supposed to agree with coerce_type() as to
whether a RelabelType should be inserted to make a subexpression be valid
input for the operators of a given opclass. However, it did the wrong
thing with
Detoast plpgsql variables if they might live across a transaction boundary.
Up to now, it's been safe for plpgsql to store TOAST pointers in its
variables because the ActiveSnapshot for whatever query called the plpgsql
function will surely protect such TOAST values from being vacuumed away,
even
doc: PG 11 release notes adjustments
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/b2b82228ee5dc08f0341b5480546479c19e84baf
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/release-11.sgml | 21 ++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
10 matches
Mail list logo