On 2019/05/11 10:25, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I struggled to talk about partitioning since there were so many
> improvements. I favored a more generic item that just suggested
> dramatic improvements. I have modified the text to:
>
> Improve performance of many operations on partitioned tabl
postgres_fdw: Fix typo in comment.
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/af16f0a7045da816d33d8b23045eca5c2473342c
Modified Files
--
contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
postgres_fdw: Fix typo in comment.
Branch
--
REL_10_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7c16a2bfdcd8d477c8ff39c5eeb7d3b87fe0d60b
Modified Files
--
contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
postgres_fdw: Fix typo in comment.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/cc866941ad4583f07e5637c145f6f6ee8a573e11
Modified Files
--
contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
postgres_fdw: Fix typo in comment.
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6ba0ff47cd9a7e86298dca3ead112eb27ae21265
Modified Files
--
contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Fix misuse of an integer as a bool.
pgtls_read_pending is declared to return bool, but what the underlying
SSL_pending function returns is a count of available bytes.
This is actually somewhat harmless if we're using C99 bools, but in
the back branches it's a live bug: if the available-bytes coun
Fix misuse of an integer as a bool.
pgtls_read_pending is declared to return bool, but what the underlying
SSL_pending function returns is a count of available bytes.
This is actually somewhat harmless if we're using C99 bools, but in
the back branches it's a live bug: if the available-bytes coun
Fix misuse of an integer as a bool.
pgtls_read_pending is declared to return bool, but what the underlying
SSL_pending function returns is a count of available bytes.
This is actually somewhat harmless if we're using C99 bools, but in
the back branches it's a live bug: if the available-bytes coun
Fix misuse of an integer as a bool.
pgtls_read_pending is declared to return bool, but what the underlying
SSL_pending function returns is a count of available bytes.
This is actually somewhat harmless if we're using C99 bools, but in
the back branches it's a live bug: if the available-bytes coun
Fix misuse of an integer as a bool.
pgtls_read_pending is declared to return bool, but what the underlying
SSL_pending function returns is a count of available bytes.
This is actually somewhat harmless if we're using C99 bools, but in
the back branches it's a live bug: if the available-bytes coun
Improve comment for att_isnull.
The comment implies that a 1 in the null bitmap indicates a null value,
but actually a 0 in the null bitmap indicates a null value. Try to
be more clear.
Patch by me; proposed wording reviewed by Alvaro Herrera and Tom Lane.
Discussion:
http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmo
Don't leave behind junk nbtree pages during split.
Commit 8fa30f906be reduced the elevel of a number of "can't happen"
_bt_split() errors from PANIC to ERROR. At the same time, the new right
page buffer for the split could continue to be acquired well before the
critical section. This was possib
Don't leave behind junk nbtree pages during split.
Commit 8fa30f906be reduced the elevel of a number of "can't happen"
_bt_split() errors from PANIC to ERROR. At the same time, the new right
page buffer for the split could continue to be acquired well before the
critical section. This was possib
Fix logical replication's ideas about which type OIDs are built-in.
Only hand-assigned type OIDs should be presumed to match across different
PG servers; those assigned during genbki.pl or during initdb are likely
to change due to addition or removal of unrelated objects.
This means that the cuto
Fix logical replication's ideas about which type OIDs are built-in.
Only hand-assigned type OIDs should be presumed to match across different
PG servers; those assigned during genbki.pl or during initdb are likely
to change due to addition or removal of unrelated objects.
This means that the cuto
Improve commentary about hack in is_publishable_class().
The FirstNormalObjectId test here is a kluge that needs to go away,
but the only substitute we can think of is to add a column to pg_class,
which will take more work than can be handled right now. Add some
commentary in the meanwhile.
Disc
Fix logical replication's ideas about which type OIDs are built-in.
Only hand-assigned type OIDs should be presumed to match across different
PG servers; those assigned during genbki.pl or during initdb are likely
to change due to addition or removal of unrelated objects.
This means that the cuto
Doc: Refer to line pointers as item identifiers.
An upcoming HEAD-only patch will standardize the terminology around
ItemIdData variables/line pointers, ending the practice of referring to
them as "item pointers". Make the "Database Page Layout" docs
consistent with the new policy. The term "ite
Doc: Refer to line pointers as item identifiers.
An upcoming HEAD-only patch will standardize the terminology around
ItemIdData variables/line pointers, ending the practice of referring to
them as "item pointers". Make the "Database Page Layout" docs
consistent with the new policy. The term "ite
Doc: Refer to line pointers as item identifiers.
An upcoming HEAD-only patch will standardize the terminology around
ItemIdData variables/line pointers, ending the practice of referring to
them as "item pointers". Make the "Database Page Layout" docs
consistent with the new policy. The term "ite
Doc: Refer to line pointers as item identifiers.
An upcoming HEAD-only patch will standardize the terminology around
ItemIdData variables/line pointers, ending the practice of referring to
them as "item pointers". Make the "Database Page Layout" docs
consistent with the new policy. The term "ite
Doc: Refer to line pointers as item identifiers.
An upcoming HEAD-only patch will standardize the terminology around
ItemIdData variables/line pointers, ending the practice of referring to
them as "item pointers". Make the "Database Page Layout" docs
consistent with the new policy. The term "ite
Doc: Refer to line pointers as item identifiers.
An upcoming HEAD-only patch will standardize the terminology around
ItemIdData variables/line pointers, ending the practice of referring to
them as "item pointers". Make the "Database Page Layout" docs
consistent with the new policy. The term "ite
Standardize ItemIdData terminology.
The term "item pointer" should not be used to refer to ItemIdData
variables, since that is needlessly ambiguous. Only
ItemPointerData/ItemPointer variables should be called item pointers.
To fix, establish the convention that ItemIdData variables should always
Fix duplicated words in comments
Author: Stephen Amell
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/539fa271-21b3-777e-a468-d96cffe9c...@gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7e19929ea29668f3d01280262e407b93042c959a
Modified Files
--
src/backend/
doc: properly attibute PG 12 pgbench release note item
Reported-by: Fabien COELHO
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.21.1905130839140.13487@lancre
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/5d971565a7993ba8dcd06d34d1387af48fdbd034
Modified Files
--
doc: improve wording of PG 12 releaase note partition item
Reported-by: Amit Langote
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/d5267ae5-bd4a-3e96-c21b-56bfa9fec...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/f4125278e3c92d8cdd83c77d0b54f468ee81c750
Modifi
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 04:01:36PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2019/05/11 10:25, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I struggled to talk about partitioning since there were so many
> > improvements. I favored a more generic item that just suggested
> > dramatic improvements. I have modified the text to:
doc: Update OID item in PG 12 release notes
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190513174759.ge23...@telsasoft.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0b62f0f2552d895301fdae56aa839c1eaae24a3a
Modified Files
--
doc/
29 matches
Mail list logo