Doc: add comments about PreventInTransactionBlock/IsInTransactionBlock.
Add a little to the header comments for these functions to make it
clearer what guarantees about commit behavior are provided to callers.
(See commit f92944137 for context.)
Although this is only a comment change, it's really
Doc: add comments about PreventInTransactionBlock/IsInTransactionBlock.
Add a little to the header comments for these functions to make it
clearer what guarantees about commit behavior are provided to callers.
(See commit f92944137 for context.)
Although this is only a comment change, it's really
Doc: add comments about PreventInTransactionBlock/IsInTransactionBlock.
Add a little to the header comments for these functions to make it
clearer what guarantees about commit behavior are provided to callers.
(See commit f92944137 for context.)
Although this is only a comment change, it's really
Doc: add comments about PreventInTransactionBlock/IsInTransactionBlock.
Add a little to the header comments for these functions to make it
clearer what guarantees about commit behavior are provided to callers.
(See commit f92944137 for context.)
Although this is only a comment change, it's really
Doc: add comments about PreventInTransactionBlock/IsInTransactionBlock.
Add a little to the header comments for these functions to make it
clearer what guarantees about commit behavior are provided to callers.
(See commit f92944137 for context.)
Although this is only a comment change, it's really
Doc: add comments about PreventInTransactionBlock/IsInTransactionBlock.
Add a little to the header comments for these functions to make it
clearer what guarantees about commit behavior are provided to callers.
(See commit f92944137 for context.)
Although this is only a comment change, it's really
Report a more useful error for reloptions on a partitioned table.
Previously, trying to set storage parameters on a partitioned table
always led to "unrecognized parameter foo", because the code expected
there might be some valid parameters; but there aren't any. The docs
make clear that it's int
Remove redundant declaration for XidInMVCCSnapshot
This was added for no good reason by c91560defc57, after b7eda3e0e334
had just moved the prototype from utils/tqual.h to utils/snapmgr.h.
Author: Japin Li
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Apply a better fix to mdunlinkfork().
Replace the stopgap fix I made in 0e758ae89 with a cleaner one.
The real problem with 4ab5dae94 is that it contorted this function's
logic substantially, by introducing a third code path that required
different behavior in the function's main loop. That seem
Apply a better fix to mdunlinkfork().
Replace the stopgap fix I made in 0e758ae89 with a cleaner one.
The real problem with 4ab5dae94 is that it contorted this function's
logic substantially, by introducing a third code path that required
different behavior in the function's main loop. That seem
Fix comment of SimpleLruInit() in slru.c
sync_handler was not mentioned in the comment block of the function.
Oversight in dee663f.
Author: Aleksander Alekseev
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TPUd9BwNY47TtMxaijLHSbyHNdhu=kvbgnvo_bi+oc...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
Branch
--
Fix comment of SimpleLruInit() in slru.c
sync_handler was not mentioned in the comment block of the function.
Oversight in dee663f.
Author: Aleksander Alekseev
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TPUd9BwNY47TtMxaijLHSbyHNdhu=kvbgnvo_bi+oc...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
Branch
--
Fix comment of SimpleLruInit() in slru.c
sync_handler was not mentioned in the comment block of the function.
Oversight in dee663f.
Author: Aleksander Alekseev
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TPUd9BwNY47TtMxaijLHSbyHNdhu=kvbgnvo_bi+oc...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
Branch
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
