Bruce Momjian wrote:
What text are people suggesting?
How do people feel about the attached doc patch?
Cheers,
Neil
Index: doc/src/sgml/release.sgml
===
RCS file: /Users/neilc/local/cvs/pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml/release.sgml,v
retrievi
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Agreed, but we just found NT problems today too. The only argument I
> can accept is that somehow platform bugs are harder to discover than our
> other code bugs.
The point isn't that they're harder to discover or not, it's that they
are new. 8.0 as a
Log Message:
---
Update Japanese FAQ.
Jun Kuwamura
Modified Files:
--
pgsql-server/doc:
FAQ_japanese (r1.15 -> r1.16)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/doc/FAQ_japanese.diff?r1=1.15&r2=1.16)
pgsql-server/doc/src/FAQ:
FAQ_
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is the release notes even the right place for it? When you read the
> > release notes after 8.1 is released, do you want to read that Win32
> > had possible problems in 8.0?
>
> Sure you do. The release notes are historical material
Log Message:
---
Update tcp connection faq.
Modified Files:
--
pgsql-server/doc:
FAQ (r1.267 -> r1.268)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/doc/FAQ.diff?r1=1.267&r2=1.268)
pgsql-server/doc/src/FAQ:
FAQ.html (r1.225 -> r1.226
Log Message:
---
Add:
> * Merge hardwired timezone names with the TZ database; allow either kind
> everywhere a TZ name is currently taken
> * Allow customization of the known set of TZ names (generalize the
> present australian_timezones hack)
Modified Files:
--
pgsql
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is the release notes even the right place for it? When you read the
> release notes after 8.1 is released, do you want to read that Win32
> had possible problems in 8.0?
Sure you do. The release notes are historical material. There is
plenty of stuff
Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I think we need to actually find someone who reports a problem before
> > stating something. I don't see how we can assume it is unstable without
> > some feedback.
>
> My count is three votes in favour of adding a disclaimer (myself, Tom,
> Marc --
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I think we need to actually find someone who reports a problem before
stating something. I don't see how we can assume it is unstable without
some feedback.
My count is three votes in favour of adding a disclaimer (myself, Tom,
Marc -- possibly Alvaro) and only one vote again
Log Message:
---
Fix typo in comment, per Andrew Dunstan.
Modified Files:
--
pgsql-server/src/bin/initdb:
initdb.c (r1.50 -> r1.51)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/bin/initdb/initdb.c.diff?r1=1.50&r2=1.51)
-
Log Message:
---
Revise ResourceOwner code to avoid accumulating ResourceOwner objects
for every command executed within a transaction. For long transactions
this was a significant memory leak. Instead, we can delete a portal's
or subtransaction's ResourceOwner immediately, if we physical
Shouldn't the regression tests reflect that?
Robert Treat
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 22:31, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> Yes
>
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > I think I missed this in the earlier patches, but does the alter table syntax
> > still work for indexes in addition to the new syn
12 matches
Mail list logo
