Refactor the way code is shared between some range type functions.
Functions like range_eq, range_before etc. are exposed at the SQL-level, but
they're also used internally by the GiST consistent support function. The
code sharing was done by a hack, TrickFunctionCall2, which relied on the
knowled
Refactor the way code is shared between some range type functions.
Functions like range_eq, range_before etc. are exposed at the SQL-level, but
they're also used internally by the GiST consistent support function. The
code sharing was done by a hack, TrickFunctionCall2, which relied on the
knowled
On 18 July 2012 20:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> Creation of the table in the
> bgwriter is fatal, because it absorbs fsync requests that should have gone
> to the checkpointer; instead they just sit in bgwriter local memory and are
> never acted on.
Hmmm, sorry about that.
I would swear I had fixed th
Fix statistics breakage from bgwriter/checkpointer process split.
ForwardFsyncRequest() supposed that it could only be called in regular
backends, which used to be true; but since the splitup of bgwriter and
checkpointer, it is also called in the bgwriter. We do not want to count
such calls in pg
Fix statistics breakage from bgwriter/checkpointer process split.
ForwardFsyncRequest() supposed that it could only be called in regular
backends, which used to be true; but since the splitup of bgwriter and
checkpointer, it is also called in the bgwriter. We do not want to count
such calls in pg
Fix management of pendingOpsTable in auxiliary processes.
mdinit() was misusing IsBootstrapProcessingMode() to decide whether to
create an fsync pending-operations table in the current process. This led
to creating a table not only in the startup and checkpointer processes as
intended, but also i
Fix management of pendingOpsTable in auxiliary processes.
mdinit() was misusing IsBootstrapProcessingMode() to decide whether to
create an fsync pending-operations table in the current process. This led
to creating a table not only in the startup and checkpointer processes as
intended, but also i
Syntax support and documentation for event triggers.
They don't actually do anything yet; that will get fixed in a
follow-on commit. But this gets the basic infrastructure in place,
including CREATE/ALTER/DROP EVENT TRIGGER; support for COMMENT,
SECURITY LABEL, and ALTER EXTENSION .. ADD/DROP EVE
