On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 04:19:26PM +, Tom Lane wrote:
> Drop server support for FE/BE protocol version 1.0.
Yay!
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember
Drop server support for FE/BE protocol version 1.0.
While this isn't a lot of code, it's been essentially untestable for
a very long time, because libpq doesn't support anything older than
protocol 2.0, and has not since release 6.3. There's no reason to
believe any other client-side code still u
On 2016-10-11 15:26:32 +, Tom Lane wrote:
> Remove "sco" and "unixware" ports.
Yay!
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
Remove "sco" and "unixware" ports.
SCO OpenServer and SCO UnixWare are more or less dead platforms.
We have never had a buildfarm member testing the "sco" port, and
the last "unixware" member was last heard from in 2012, so it's
fair to doubt that the code even compiles anymore on either one.
Remo
Docs: grammatical fix.
Fix poor grammar introduced in 741ccd501.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c7e56811fa38cbc39efd6bdd4bb45f2f0444803e
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Docs: grammatical fix.
Fix poor grammar introduced in 741ccd501.
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/1fd64a9277439c94b8e102da6ced534f91807e57
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 dele
Improve documentation for CREATE RECURSIVE VIEW.
It was perhaps not entirely clear that internal self-references shouldn't
be schema-qualified even if the view name is written with a schema.
Spell it out.
Discussion: <[email protected]>
Branch
--
REL9_5_STABLE
Details
---
h
Improve documentation for CREATE RECURSIVE VIEW.
It was perhaps not entirely clear that internal self-references shouldn't
be schema-qualified even if the view name is written with a schema.
Spell it out.
Discussion: <[email protected]>
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
h
Improve documentation for CREATE RECURSIVE VIEW.
It was perhaps not entirely clear that internal self-references shouldn't
be schema-qualified even if the view name is written with a schema.
Spell it out.
Discussion: <[email protected]>
Branch
--
REL9_3_STABLE
Details
---
h
Improve documentation for CREATE RECURSIVE VIEW.
It was perhaps not entirely clear that internal self-references shouldn't
be schema-qualified even if the view name is written with a schema.
Spell it out.
Discussion: <[email protected]>
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://g
Improve documentation for CREATE RECURSIVE VIEW.
It was perhaps not entirely clear that internal self-references shouldn't
be schema-qualified even if the view name is written with a schema.
Spell it out.
Discussion: <[email protected]>
Branch
--
REL9_4_STABLE
Details
---
h
11 matches
Mail list logo