On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
>> I think this removes too many comments from index_drop that explains why
>> it's done that way.
>
> Complaint registered. If either of you can send a patch I will gladly
> push it, otherwise it will take me some time
Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2013-10-01 21:00:43 +, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Add WaitForLockers in lmgr, refactoring index.c code
> >
> > This is in support of a future REINDEX CONCURRENTLY feature.
>
> I think this removes too many comments from index_drop that explains why
> it's don
Hi,
On 2013-10-01 21:00:43 +, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Add WaitForLockers in lmgr, refactoring index.c code
>
> This is in support of a future REINDEX CONCURRENTLY feature.
I think this removes too many comments from index_drop that explains why
it's done that way.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Add WaitForLockers in lmgr, refactoring index.c code
This is in support of a future REINDEX CONCURRENTLY feature.
Michael Paquier
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/15732b34e8c856bf94469b78ab49446430a9c203
Modified Files
--
src/backend/cata
